PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Sugan Chand Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This Criminal Appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with the following prayer:-
2. Brief facts of the case as placed before this Court by the learned counsel for the appellant are that on 20.08.1995, Jai Singh lodged a written report before State Bureau of Investigation, Bhilwara to that effect that he had purchased a bus bearing license No. RJY-3013, which was on the route from Gangapur to Bheem on 15.8.1995, and although it was travelling on the right side, another bus, bearing license plate no. RJ-06-P-0261 came from the opposite side, and that the driver was under the influence of alcohol and driving in a rash and negligent manner. Subsequently, that he lodged a case of accident at Police Station, Kareda, and that the matter was investigated by the appellant, SHO Sugan Chand, whom the complainant met and requested to
B. Noha Vs. State of Kerala and Ors. (2006) 12 SCC 277
Chandrappa and Ors. v. State of Karnataka (2007) 4 SCC 415
Guruviah & Ors. Vs. The State (2019) 8 SCC 396
Murugesan and Ors. v. State through Inspector of Police (2012) 10 SCC 383
N. Vijayakumar Vs. State of T.N. (2021) 3 SCC 687
State of A.P. v. Kommaraju Gopala Krishna Murthy (2000) 9 SCC 752
State of Gujarat Vs. Bhalchandra Laxmishankar Dave (2021) 2 SCC 735.
State of M.P. & Ors. Vs. Ram Singh (2000) 5 SCC 88
State through Inspector of Police
State of Gujarat Vs. Bhalchandra Laxmishankar Dave (2021) 2 SCC 735
T. Shankar Prasad v. State of A.P. (2004) 3 SCC 753
The State of Gujarat Vs. Navinbhai Chandrakant Joshi and Ors. (2018) 9 SCC 242
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.