Back
AJAY RASTOGI, BELA M. TRIVEDI
Innovative Buildestates Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
RG Buildestate Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of appellant's counsel (Para 1) |
| 2. no interference in prior order (Para 2) |
| 3. civil appeal dismissed (Para 3) |
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
2. We do not find any reason to interfere in the order impugned passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dated 22.02.2022.
3. The civil appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
The court's decision was based on the lack of grounds for interference with the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.
The court declined to interfere with the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.
The court declined to interfere with the judgments impugned in the Civil Appeals.
The court found no reason to interfere with the judgment under appeal.
Courts emphasize the importance of addressing grievances about the implementation of their orders directly to the court, rather than seeking alternative remedies.
The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing an appeal and urged the NCLAT to expedite the hearing without interfering with the interlocutory order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
