SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 554

DIPANKAR DATTA, MANMOHAN
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Rukma Kesh Mishra – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

DIPANKAR DATTA, J.

1. Leave granted.

THE APPEAL

2. Appellants - the State of Jharkhand and three of its officers - assail the judgment and order dated 24th November, 20231 [impugned order] of a Division Bench of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi2 [High Court] in this civil appeal. By the impugned order, the Division Bench dismissed an intra-court appeal3 [LPA No. 572 of 2023] carried by the appellants from the judgment and order dated 20th April, 2023 of a Single Judge, allowing a writ petition4 [WP (S) No. 4781 of 2017] instituted by the respondent-Rukma Kesh Mishra.

THE QUESTION

3. We are tasked to decide a solitary legal question: whether the order by which the respondent was dismissed from service, following disciplinary proceedings, should have been interdicted by the High Court on the specious ground that the charge-sheet had not been approved by the Chief Minister of Jharkhand?5 [Chief Minister]

BRIEF RESUME OF FACTS

4. Facts giving rise to this appeal are not too complicated. While the respondent had been functioning as a civil service officer, it came to light that he had indulged in diverse activities of dishonesty, financial irregularities, forgery of docume

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top