S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Porsche Father in Swap Case
11 Mar 2026
Natural Gas Supplies Prioritized Under Section 3 Essential Commodities Act Amid LNG Disruptions: Central Govt Order
11 Mar 2026
Delhi High Court Directs Ministries, CBFC to Implement Film Accessibility Features for Disabled Persons per RPWD Act Guidelines
11 Mar 2026
Foreign Nationals Entitled to Article 22(1) Grounds of Arrest in Known Language: Karnataka HC Sets at Liberty but Orders Handover to FRRO
11 Mar 2026
Madras HC Permits CBSE Student to Appear for Maths as Additional Subject Despite Policy Violation in Peculiar 'Rat Race' Circumstances
11 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Neha Rathore
11 Mar 2026
Menaka Guruswamy Elected India's First Openly Queer Rajya Sabha MP
11 Mar 2026
ABHAY S. OKA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
A Rajendra – Appellant
Versus
Gonugunta Madhusudhan Rao – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.
1. These appeals have been preferred against the Order dated 18.01.2024 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “NCLAT”) where appeals preferred by the appellant herein stand dismissed as a consequence of dismissal of the applications of condonation of delay on the even date.
2. Two appeals were preferred before the NCLAT against two separate orders passed on 20.07.2023 by the National Company Law Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “NCLT”) where an application filed by the appellant herein who is the shareholder and suspended Managing Director of Dharti Dredging and Infrastructure Limited (Corporate Debtor) under Section 60(5) read with Section 35(1)(N) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “IBC”) seeking a direction to the respondent(s) to place the Resolution Plans submitted by him before the Committee of Creditors (CoC) for consideration along with the other Resolution Plan and for staying the voting results on the Resolution Plan which was dismissed and another application preferr
(1) Appeal – Period of limitation – Any party which is aggrieved by decision of NCLT can file appeal before NCLAT – Statutory time limit of 30 days within which appeal can be preferred, is extendable....
The NCLAT cannot condone delays beyond the statutory maximum of 45 days under the IBC, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation periods in insolvency processes.
Appeal – Limitation – Though National Company Law Appellate Tribunal is clothed with powers to exempt and to extend time under Rules 14 and 15 of NCLAT Rules respectively, such powers cannot be exerc....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of clarity and consistency in administrative guidance, particularly regarding the computation of limitation for filing an appeal. Th....
Appeal – Limitation stops running on e-filing of appeal before NCLAT and not on presentation of physical copy – Date on which limitation begins to run is intrinsically linked to date of pronouncement....
The court established that free certified copies and those obtained for a fee are treated equally for appeal purposes under the IBC and relevant rules.
Delay in filing an appeal under the IBC cannot be excused based on lack of knowledge regarding the proceedings; Limitation must be strictly construed.
The limitation for filing an appeal begins upon the pronouncement of the order and not its publication, making delays uncondonable if not filed timely.
The IBC mandates strict adherence to limitation periods for appeals, emphasizing timely resolution in insolvency proceedings.
The court recognized the importance of e-filing in legal procedures while addressing challenges related to limitation periods in appeals before the NCLAT.
Sesh Nath Singh & Anr. V. Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Co-operative Bank Ltd and Anr.
-
Read summaryV Nagarajan Vs. SKS Ispat and Power Limited
-
Read summaryCethar Limited (Resolution Professional) Vs. SKS Ispat & Power Ltd.
-
Read summaryNational Spot Exchange Limited vs. Anil Kohli, Resolution Professional for Dunar Foods Limited
-
Read summarySanjay Pandurang Kalate Vs. Vistra ITCL India Pvt. Ltd.
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.