SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, JJ.
Kabir Paharia – Appellant
Versus
National Medical Commission and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No(s). 5836 of 2025, (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No (s). 29275 of 2024)
Decided On : 02-05-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial review and granting of leave. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background on appellant's qualifications and disability. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments for reconsideration based on assistive devices. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. argument on the evaluation standards for disabilities. (Para 10) |
| 5. conclusion mandating admission in mbbs and upholding rights. (Para 12 , 13 , 16) |
| 6. emphasis on rights and accommodations for pwbd. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. court's directive to revise guidelines and ensure equality in admissions. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER :
Mehta, J.
1. Heard.
2. Leave granted.
3. The appellant being a person with benchmark disabilities (for short ‘PwBD’) belongs to the reserved category of Scheduled Caste and aspires for admission to the MBBS UG (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) course. Having been denied admission to the MBBS course, despite standing high in merit in his category i.e., Scheduled Castes-PwBD quota, the appellant approached the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi1[ Hereinafter referred to as ‘High Court.’] by filing a Writ Petition (C) No. 12165 of 2024, which came to be rejected vide order dated 10th September, 2024. The Letters Patent Appeal No. 967 of 2024, preferred by the appellant, also stands rejected by the Division Bench of the High Court vide order dated 12th November, 2024, which is assailed in this appeal by special leave.
4. The facts in brief, essential for disposal of the present matter, can be gathered from the detailed order dated 2nd April, 2025 passed by this Court, which is reproduced hereinbelow: -
“congenital absence of multiple fingers in both hands as well as involvement of left foot (2nd and 3rd toe), the extent whereof has been assessed at 42%.”
3. Despite the structural disadvantages referred to above, the petitioner performed exceedingly well in the examination scoring 542 marks and secured a category rank of 176. It may be stated that the cut- off marks for these subcategories were 143-127. Having made the cut-off for the SC/PwBD category with flying colours, the petitioner staked his rightful claim for the next stage which requires the issuance of a Certificate of Disability for NEET Admissions (“NEET Disability Certificate”) by a designated ‘Disability Certification Centre’. Accordingly, the petitioner approached the Vardhman Mahavir Medical College-Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi (for short “VMMC-SJ Hospital”) for medical assessment. Even though, the VMMC-SJ Hospital assessed the petitioner’s disability at 68%, it concluded that under the NMC/MCI guidelines, the petitioner was not entitled to pursue the medical courses. The conclusions drawn by the certifying body in the certificate dated 19th August, 2024, are reproduced below for ready reference:-
“Conclusion: Based on quantification of disability The candidate is not eligible to pursue medical courses (as per NMC norms).
Remark: BILATERAL UPEER (sic) LIMB INVOLVEMENT
The Disability Certification Board certifies that the candidate is not eligible for admission in Medical/Dental courses and to avail 5% PwD reservation as per the NMC/MCI Gazette Notification.”
4. Aggrieved by his disqualification from admission in the MBBS course on the ground of benchmark disabilities, despite standing high in merit, the petitioner approached the High Court of Delhi by filing Writ Petition (Civil) No. 12165 of 2024.
5. The learned Single Bench of the High Court directed the All-India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi to constitute a Board of three experts to reassess the petitioner’s disabilities and to give an opinion as to whether the petitioner would be able to pursue medical courses and perform as a Doctor. In
The right to reasonable accommodation for PwBD candidates in educational admissions is fundamental; systemic discrimination based on disabilities violates constitutional equal rights.
Exclusion from admission despite valid disability certification violates rights and mandates of reasonable accommodation under disability laws.
The quantified disability alone cannot disqualify a candidate from medical admission; functional assessment and reasonable accommodations are essential for eligibility under the Rights of Persons wit....
The court upheld the exclusion of candidates with disabilities from medical admissions based on a lawful assessment of functional eligibility, balancing inclusion with patient safety under the Rights....
The court emphasized that eligibility for medical courses must be based on functional assessments rather than mere disability quantification, reinforcing the principle of reasonable accommodation for....
Disability quantification should not disqualify candidates from medical education; functional competency must be assessed for eligibility.
Quantified disability alone cannot disqualify candidates from educational opportunities; individual assessments must determine eligibility based on the ability to pursue the course.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of meeting the eligibility criteria, including the condition of both hands being intact with intact sensation, sufficient strength, ....
The court affirmed that the UDID must be prioritized for disability claims over conflicting assessments, reinforcing the legal right to reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities.
The court upheld the validity of amended eligibility regulations for medical admissions requiring intact limbs and functional competency, emphasizing adherence to application timelines as lawful and ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.