SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 780

SURYA KANT, UJJAL BHUYAN
Krishan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Narender Kumar Verma, AOR Dr. Mrs. Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Gagan Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ananta Prasad Mishra, AOR Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Mr. Alok Sangwan, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sangwan, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Fateh Singh, Adv. Mr. Shikhar Narwal, Adv. Mr. Amit Ojha, Adv. Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Alok Sangwan, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, AOR Ms. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. Ms. Rajat Sangwan, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sangwan, Adv. Ms. Pragya Upadhyay, Adv. Ms. Drishti Saraf, Adv. Mr. Shikhar Narwal, Adv. Ms. Drishti Rawal, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ananta Prasad Mishra, AOR Mr. Vikas Verma, AOR Ms. Sapna Verma, Adv. Mr. Shafik Ahmed, Adv. Ms. Kavita Verma, Adv. Ms. Anju, Adv. Mr. Varun Sharma, Adv. Ms. Aakriti Yunas, Adv. Dr. Mrs. Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv. Mr. Keane Sardinha, Adv. Mr. Shiv Kumar Khacchi, Adv. Ms. Aparna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Narender Kumar Verma, AOR Mr. H L Tikku, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikas Kumar, AOR Ms. Yashmeet Kaur, Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv. Mr. Kedar R Seludkar, Adv. Ms. Jayati Arora, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

SURYA KANT, J.

Leave granted.

2. The instant batch of cross-appeals have been preferred by the Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC) and various landowners, challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh (High Court) for the land situated in the villages of Fazalwas and Kukrola, Tehsil Manesar, District Gurgaon, State of Haryana.

3. The High Court has conclusively determined the quantum of compensation through various identical impugned orders. However, for the purposes of lucidity, we have sought to refer to HSIIDC v. Pinky Yadav and others, RFA-4959-2015 (O&M) and other connected cases. and Kanwar Sain Jain and another v. State of Haryana and others, RFA-4437-2014 (O&M) and other connected cases. which may be considered as the ‘lead judgments’ for the villages of Kukrola and Fazalwas, respectively.

4. The aforementioned decisions have enhanced compensation for the acquired lands in both villages, specifically for the lands abutting National Highway-8 (Delhi-Jaipur Road) (NH-8), up to the depth of 5 acres to INR 87,24,885 per acre for Kukrola and INR 1,21,00,000 per acre for Fazalwa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top