SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 803

SANJIV KHANNA, SANJAY KUMAR, R. MAHADEVAN
C. T. Kochouseph – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. C.N. Sreekumar, Sr. Adv. Ms. Anupama Kumar, Adv. Mr. Debasis Jena, Adv. Mr. Rahul Kulhare, Adv. Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, AOR Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Rajan Narain, AOR Ms. Mallika Joshi, Adv. Mr. M. P. Vinod, AOR Mr. V Sridharan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sahil Parghi, Adv. Mr. Ayush Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, AOR Ms. Neha Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Nitum Jain, Adv. Ms. Umang Motiyani, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. G. Prakash, AOR Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. V. Girl, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Adv. Mr. C. K. Sasi, AOR Ms. Meena K Poulose, Adv. Mr. Nihar Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR Mr. C. Kranthi Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Adv. Mr. Sarathraj B, Adv. Mr. Danish Saifi, Adv. Ms. Aswani Satheesh, Adv.

Table of Content
1. main issues concerning tax applicability. (Para 1 , 2)
2. tax liability on goods purchase (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. analysis of tax provisions and their implications. (Para 6)
4. court's analysis of tax imposition (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. distance between taxability and payability (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
6. constitutionality of tax provisions upheld (Para 30 , 31)
7. dismissal of appeals favored state revenue (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)

JUDGMENT :

Leave granted in SLP (C) Nos. 9420-9422 of 2012.

3. The following issues arise for our consideration:

4. At the outset, it is important to note that this is essentially a legacy dispute. Following the enactment and enforcement of the Value Added Tax in 2005 and the Goods and Services Tax Acts in 2017, the legal issue in question no longer arises for consideration under the current legal framework.

5. At this stage, it will be apposite to quote the relevant statutory provisions of both the Kerala and TAMIL NADU ACT s.

    “Section 2(g) “dealer” means any person who carries on the business of buying, selling, supplying or distributing goods, directly or otherwise, whether for cash, or for deferred payment, or for commission, remuneration

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top