Back
VIKRAM NATH, PRASANNA B. VARALE
Competition Commission of India – Appellant
Versus
Schott Glass India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of competition act's balance (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. statutory provisions on dominance (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. factual background of parties and agreements (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. findings from director general's investigation (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. compat's ruling on penalty (Para 20) |
| 6. parties' requests for reliefs (Para 21) |
| 7. contentions from parties on dominant market behavior (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. issues for adjudication outlined (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 9. analysis of target-discount scheme (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 10. assessment of functional discount scheme (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 11. evaluation of long-term tubing supply agreement (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 12. investigation of tying or bundling claims (Para 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 13. necessity of effects-based analysis (Para 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 14. procedural fairness and cross-examination rights (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60) |
| 15. conclusion on competition law enforcement principles (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66) |
| 16. final judgment on the appeals (Para 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 17. effects-based considerations are crucial for evaluating competitive practices in law. (Para 76 , 79) |
JUDGMENT
Abuse of dominance requires demonstrable harm to competition; mere market presence does not equate to illicit practices without evidence of competitive harm or unfair business conduct.
The Competition Commission of India must establish a prima facie case before ordering an investigation; failure to do so renders its orders void.
The judgment establishes that the CCI must have a principled prima facie basis to initiate an investigation under the Competition Act, failing which such directives lack jurisdiction and can be quash....
An order under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act is administrative, only initiating an investigation without affecting parties' rights.
Section 19(1) of the Act would show that the Act originally provided for the “receipt of a complaint” from any person, consumer or their association, or trade association.
The court established that a prima facie case of cartelisation can be inferred from parallel pricing among a limited number of suppliers, and that the CCI has the authority to initiate investigations....
(1) Purchaser of a lottery ticket is a potential user and a service is being made available by selling agents in context of Competition Act, 2002.(2) Inclusive mentioning does not inhibit larger expa....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
