SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA, JJ.
Hansura Bai & Anr. – Appellants
VERSUS
The State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No(s). of 2025 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No (s). 3450 of 2025)
Decided On : 15-05-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. custodial death details and abuse by police (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. post-mortem outcome and fir registration (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. writ petition for investigation transfer (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. arguments for cbi investigation and bail (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. need for independent investigation (Para 25 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. order for cbi investigation transfer (Para 31 , 32) |
| 7. bail considerations and witness protection (Para 33 , 34 , 36) |
| 8. court's directive for cbi investigation and witness protection. (Para 35) |
| 9. conclusion and disposal of appeal (Para 37 , 38) |
JUDGMENT
Mehta, J.
1. Heard.
2. Leave granted.
3. The appellants herein have approached this Court, through this appeal by special leave, assailing the judgment dated 20th December, 2024, passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior [Hereinafter, being referred to as the ‘High Court’] in Writ Petition No. 33416 of 2024, whereby the learned Single Judge turned down the prayer made by the appellants for transferring the investigation into the custodial death of Deva Pardhi to some other investigating agency; and to direct the release of sole eye-witness to the custodial torture, namely, Gangaram Pardhi on bail.
4. Facts as emerging from the record reveal that one Bhagwan Singh, resident of Village Bhidra, lodged an FIR No. 232 of 2024 at Myana Police Station against unknown persons for theft and house trespass by night punishable under Sections 380 and
457 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 [For short, ‘IPC’]. As per the complainant, substantial articles of silver and gold jewellery and cash were stolen from the safe of his house on 2nd June, 2024. The FIR of the said incident came to be registered on 3rd June, 2024.
5. The appellants are mother and aunt respectively of Deva Pardhi, whose marriage was scheduled to be solemnised on 14th July, 2024 with one Nikita Pardhi. It is the case of the appellants that while the Haldi ritual was going on, about 30-40 police personnel entered the wedding venue in 5-6 police cars and two motorcycles. The time was around 04:00 P.M. to 04:30 P.M., when 10 police officials entered into Deva Pardhi’s house and immediately overpowered and handcuffed him along with his uncle, Gangaram Pardhi, the husband of appellant No. 2, and started assaulting both of them. The remaining members of the police team surrounded the house. When the family members, including women and children, tried to resist/oppose the high-handed acts of the errant police officials, they too were manhandled and beaten up. Deva Pardhi and Gangaram Pardhi were dragged by the police officials and were forcibly taken away in the police van to the Jhagar Chowki. The family members were told that they would be taken to Myana Police Station for inquiry in the aforesaid theft case. The police officials further assured that both Deva Pardhi and Gangaram Pardhi would be safely brought back by the next morning. It is alleged that the police officials took Deva Pardhi and Gangaram Pardhi to the old Thana instead of the new Thana premises which has CCTV facilities. Women folk from both the households visited the police station, but they were not allowed to meet and speak to Deva Pardhi and Gangaram Pardhi.
6. Both Deva Pardhi and Gangaram Pardhi were threatened and were subjected to intense third- degree treatment including beating by ropes, putting chilly powder, petrol, salt and hot water on their bodies. Deva Pardhi was strung up by ropes and was hung upside down from the roof. His face was covered with a black cloth which was tied to his ankle using a string. He was repeatedly doused with water in an attempt to suffocate him. By putting Deva Pardhi in fear of death, the police officials pressurized him to confess to the commission of theft as reported by Bhagwan Singh. Gangaram Pardhi tried to intervene saying that they did not have any idea about the so- called theft. Deva Pardhi was tortured in this manner for about three hours whereafter the rope was cut. Resulta
The court emphasized the need for independent investigation by CBI in custodial death cases involving police officers to ensure credibility, public trust, and witness protection.
The necessity for a C.B.I. investigation arises in cases where police personnel are accused, ensuring fairness and public confidence in the judicial process.
The court emphasized that seeking a fair investigation is a fundamental right, necessitating the transfer of cases to an independent agency when bias or influence is suspected.
Judicial intervention in criminal investigations is warranted to ensure fair process and public trust when local authorities are ineffective or biased.
High Court may transfer investigation to CBI only when convincing evidence shows local police's inability to conduct a fair inquiry; dissatisfaction alone is insufficient.
Point of law : Criminal Law – Transfer of investigation - Transfer of investigation to CBI is not a matter of routine, in extraordinary circumstances by using powers of this Court sparingly in except....
Criminal Law - Transfer of investigation - Not rarest of rare case - Investigation to be conducted officer above rank of A.C.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.