SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN, JJ.
Old Jalukai Village Council – Appellant
Versus
Kakiho Village and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. of 2025 [Arising Out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 9897 of 2016]
Decided On : 23-05-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. issue of village recognition parameters and compliance with customary laws. (Para 1) |
| 2. recognition process for new villages in nagaland. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. arguments on recognition of kakiho village. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. respondents defend recognition against objections. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. state supports recognition process after boundary resolution. (Para 34) |
| 6. discussion on boundary dispute implications for recognition. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 7. recommendations for administrative action by the state. (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 8. court mandates recognition process for kakiho village. (Para 71 , 72 , 73) |
JUDGMENT :
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:
| INDEX | |
| (A) | FACTUAL MATRIX |
| (B) | SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES |
| (i) Submissions on behalf of the appellant | |
| (ii) Submissions on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 and 2 | |
| (iii) Submissions on behalf of the State | |
| (C) | ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION |
| (D) | ANALYSIS |
| (i) Whether all the necessary conditions/criteria for the issuance of formal orders of recognition as per the O.M. dated 22.03.1996 and 01.10.2005 respectively were fulfilled? | |
| (ii) Whether the existence of an “inter-district boundary dispute” was a valid reason to keep the recognition of the respondent no. 1 village in abeyance? | |
| (E) | CONCLUSION |
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal arises from the Judgment and Order passed by the High Court of Gauhati, Kohima Bench in Writ Appeal No. 6(K) of 2015 dated 07.10.2015 (hereinafter the “impugned decision”) by which the High Court affirmed the Judgment and Order passed by the Single Judge in Writ Petition (C) No. 65(K) of 2014 directing the State authorities to take steps for the issuance of formal orders for the recognition of the respondent no. 1 village within a period of three months. The said period was however, extended by another four months subsequently.
(A) FACTUAL MATRIX
3. Land is one of the priceless assets for the people of Nagaland and forms an inalienable part of their identity and life.1 [A. NSHOGA, TRADITIONAL NAGA VILLAGE SYSTEM AND ITS TRANSFORMATION 87 (Anshah Publishing House 2009)] The landholding system in Nagaland differs slightly from the rest of the States and is especially characterized by its non-cadastral nature. Each district, more or less, is occupied by a predominant concentration of one major tribe and other sub-tribes with distinct socio-cultural and linguistic characteristics, and therefore, the different districts of the State are demarcated primarily on the basis of the inhabitation patterns of a specific tribe or tribes.2 [LANUSASHI LONGKUMER ET. AL., STATUS OF ADIVASIS/INDIGENOUS PEOPLES LAND SERIES - 6: NAGALAND 20 (Aakar Books 2012)] Land is either owned communally by a clan or village or, by individuals and a new village is formed only within the community land which is owned by its inhabitants. The formation of villages and its recognition is also extensively rooted in customary traditions and practices. It is the case of the appellant that since the establishment and recognition of a new village on the ancestral land of another village results in the transfer of ownership of the said land to the newly created village, the prevailing custom requires the village ancestrally owning such land to accord their consent by way of a ‘No Objection Certificate’ to the new village which is sought to be established on their land.
4. The aforesaid custom is said to have been recognized in the O.M. dated 22.03.1996 issued by the State of Nagaland which lays down several criteria for the recognition of villages. The relevant portions of the same read as follows:
“Government of Nagaland
Home Department
(Gen
Mangyang Lima vs. State of Nagaland and Others
Sabeituo Mechulho and Others vs. State of Nagaland and Others
Sachidanand Pandey and Another vs. State of West Bengal and Others
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others vs. Chaudhari Ran Beer Singh and Another
AI
Recognition of villages in Nagaland requires adherence to established customary practices, necessitating 'No Objection Certificates' and compliance with the prescribed procedures outlined in the rele....
The selection of Village Council Members must comply with customary practices and the Nagaland Village Councils Act, ensuring fair representation of all clans regardless of household numbers.
When a statutory functionary makes an order based on certain grounds, its validity must be judged by the reasons so mentioned and cannot be supplemented by fresh reasons in the shape of affidavit or ....
The RFCTLARR Act, 2013 is not applicable in Nagaland unless adopted by the state legislative assembly, as per Article 371A of the Constitution, which provides special provisions regarding land owners....
Only civil courts have jurisdiction to determine ownership and rights over land, while administrative authorities must adhere to the statutory framework, as established in this case.
The villagers' right to object to the government's use of donated land and the temporary nature of the land allotments were key legal principles established in the judgment.
cow-herding - Claim of rights in land - a person who has for the last three generations resided in the forest land and depend on the forest for their bonafide livelihood needs - a person who has for ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.