Back
ABHAY S. OKA, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
I. S. Tomar – Appellant
Versus
Invertis University – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of appeals and ngt's orders (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of ngt's decisions and violations (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. appellants' arguments on ngt's findings (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's evaluation of the ngt's action and legal interpretations (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. final ruling and orders (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The issue involved in these appeals is very limited. Whether the appellants can be subjected to a penalty by the National Green Tribunal (for short ‘the NGT’) in exercise of powers under Section 26 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (for short ‘the NGT Act’) on account of their failure to comply with the orders passed by it. The appellants are Dr. I.S. Tomar, the then Mayor of the Municipal Corporation, Bareilly (in Civil Appeal Nos. 4599-4601 of 2014) the Municipal Corporation, Bareilly and its Commissioner (in Civil Appeal Nos. 5631-5633 of 2024).
(i) We accept the unconditional apology tendered by the Respondent No.5 for making such undesirable r
The court held that penalties against public officials for violating tribunal orders must be supported by evidence of willful misconduct, and officials without sufficient authority cannot be penalize....
The court emphasized that penalties for environmental non-compliance must be based on sound legal principles and supported by evidence, ensuring adherence to natural justice.
The National Green Tribunal retains exclusive jurisdiction to assess environmental compensation, and its orders cannot be stayed by writ jurisdiction.
The Head of a Government Department is deemed guilty for non-compliance with NGT orders unless proven otherwise, establishing accountability under the NGT Act.
The National Green Tribunal must comply with principles of natural justice, ensuring parties have the opportunity to present their case before any adverse decisions are made.
The NGT cannot delegate its core adjudicatory functions to administrative expert committees and must adjudicate on environmental issues within its jurisdiction.
Principles of natural justice must be followed in administrative decisions, granting parties the right to contest allegations, particularly when sanctions affect them materially.
(1) Observance of Principles of Natural Justice by NGT is mandatory.(2) Recommendations made by an Expert Committee are not binding on NGT – They are only by way of assistance to enable NGT to arrive....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
