SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1129

B. R. GAVAI, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Grasim Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajat Jariwal, Adv. Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. S. Abhishek Iyer, Adv. Ms. Nishtha Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shatakshi Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Dev Chand, Adv. For M/s. Trilegal Mr. R. Basant, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manish Nair, Adv. Mr. T. G. Narayanan Nair, AOR Mr. Raunak Arora, Adv. Mr. Naman Vashishta, Adv. Ms. Samyuktha H Nair, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv. Mr. Salvador Santosh Rebello, AOR Mr. Jaskirat Pal Singh, Adv. Ms. Kritika, Adv. Mr. Pranjal Pandey, Adv. Mr. Rahul Pratap, AOR

JUDGMENT

B.R. GAVAI, J.

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1711-1712/2021

1. These appeals challenge the order dated 07.04.2021 passed by the National Green Tribunal (NGT), vide which the NGT has held that the appellant had committed a violation of the provisions of Environment Protection Act. The Court found that the appellant had failed to install the online flow meter in CS2 stacks to quantify the CS2 emissions. It also found that the acid produced which is a by-product of the process employed by the appellant was hazardous to the environment. The NGT, therefore, on different counts imposed penalty of Rs.75,00,000/- each.

2. We have heard Shri Neeraj Kishan Kaul, learned senior counsel for the appellant and Shri Raghav Sharma, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1/State of Madhya Pradesh through Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board and Shri Rahul Pratap, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2.

3. Though, Shri Neeraj Kishan Kaul, learned Senior Counsel, submits that there is no violation as found by the learned NGT, we find that the present appeals deserve to be allowed on the following short ground.

4. After the NGT entertained the O.A. on the basis of the letter addressed by Respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top