N. V. ANJARIA, K. V. ARAVIND
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Government Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA)
At the outset, learned Additional Solicitor General Mr. K. Arvind Kamath, assisted by learned Central Government Standing Counsel Mr. B. Pramod for the petitioners does not press prayer (ii) in paragraph 32, seeking to delete the same.
2. Accordingly, prayer in paragraph 32(ii) is permitted to be deleted, which was as under,
2.1 Similarly, in the interim prayer, the following part was not pressed and sought to be deleted, which is permitted to be deleted,
3. The Union of India along with its two limbs namely M/s. Madras Engineering Group
Harbanslal Sahnia vs. Indian Oil Corporation [(2003) 2 SCC 107]
L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India [(1997) 3 SCC 261]
Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corpn. v. Gayatri Construction Co. [(2008) 8 SCC 172]
Radhakishan Industries vs. State of H.P. [(2021) 6 SCC 771]
State of U.P. vs. Mohammed Noor [AIR 1958 SC 86]
Veena Gupta vs. Central Pollution Control Board [(2024) 2 Scale 200]
Whirlpool Corpn. v. Registrar of Trade Marks [(1998) 8 SCC 1]
The National Green Tribunal must comply with principles of natural justice, ensuring parties have the opportunity to present their case before any adverse decisions are made.
The court declined to entertain the writ petition invoking the doctrine of forum conveniens, holding that the appropriate forum to consider the challenge to the NGT's orders would be the Gujarat High....
Requirements of prior Environmental Clearance - It is a trite law that a writ cannot be issued on ground of violation of principles of natural justice if only one conclusion is possible in a given si....
The NGT must adhere to principles of natural justice and cannot abdicate its adjudicatory role to committees; fair hearing is essential in decisions regarding environmental compensations.
The court applied the doctrine of forum conveniens to decline to entertain the petition, holding that the appropriate forum to consider the challenge raised in the petition would be the Gujarat High ....
The court recognized that procedural unfairness by the National Green Tribunal can justify the maintainability of a writ petition despite statutory alternative remedies existing.
(1) Observance of Principles of Natural Justice by NGT is mandatory.(2) Recommendations made by an Expert Committee are not binding on NGT – They are only by way of assistance to enable NGT to arrive....
The National Green Tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 16 permits aggrieved parties to challenge environmental clearances to ensure compliance with ecological protection standards.
Court confirmed the mandatory requirement of gap analysis for the establishment of new biomedical waste facilities, emphasizing jurisdictional limitations on appellate authority and the importance of....
The National Green Tribunal retains exclusive jurisdiction to assess environmental compensation, and its orders cannot be stayed by writ jurisdiction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.