Sanjay Prakash vs Union Of India - 2025 Supreme(SC) 916

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(SC) 916

ABHAY S. OKA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Sanjay Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Abhisek Mohanty, Adv., Adv. Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, AOR Mr. Abhishek Puri, Adv. Ms. Surabhi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. Mr. Sahil Grewal, Adv. Ms. Surbhi Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Reeta Dewan Puri, Adv. Mr. P. N. Puri, AOR Mr. K. Parameshwar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nishanth Patil, AOR Mr. Rishav Ambasta, Adv. Mr. Mv Mukunda, Adv. Mr. Nishanth Patil, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gautam, Adv. Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kishan Gautam, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Pandey, Adv. Ms. Chinmay K Bhatt, Adv. Ms. Amrita Pandey, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Supriya Juneja, AOR Mr. Aditya Singla, Adv. Ms. Asees Kaur, Adv. Mr. Kushagra Raghuvanshi, Adv. Mrs. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv. Ms. Shreya Jain, Adv. Mr. Abhijeet Singh, Adv. Mr. A.K. Sharma, AOR Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma B, Adv. Mr. Raghvendra S Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Adit Khorana, Adv. Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Navanjay Mahapatra, Adv. Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Sriram Krishna, AOR Mr. Nitin Bhardwaj, AOR Mr. Satyam Thareja, AOR

Table of Content
1. common grievance of capf personnel. (Para 2 , 3)
2. claims based on pay commission report. (Para 4 , 6)
3. sixth central pay commission's observations. (Para 5 , 7)
4. the grievances of capfs about service rules and nffu stem from their classification as ogas. (Para 8)
5. high court rulings on ogas classification. (Para 11 , 16)
6. issues surrounding nffu eligibility. (Para 12 , 19)
7. detailed discussions reflect the established status of capfs as ogas which must receive benefits accordingly. (Para 23 , 25 , 31)
8. outcome of capfs as ogas and cadre review. (Para 24 , 32 , 45)

JUDGMENT :

UJJAL BHUYAN, J.

Substantive grievance in all the civil appeals being identical, those were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2. All the civil appeals arise out of the common judgment and order dated 27.07.2020 passed by the High Court of Delhi (High Court) disposing of the following writ petitions:

(i) W.P.(C) No. 12052 of 2019 (Tarun Kumar Banjaree & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.);

(ii) W.P.(C) No. 12751 of 2019 (Sanjay Prakash & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.);

(iii) W.P.(C) No. 12875 of 2019 (Mahendra Singh Deo Vs. Union of India & Ors.);

(iv) W.P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2025 Supreme(SC) 916

ABHAY S. OKA, UJJAL BHUYANSanjay Prakash – AppellantVersusUnion Of India – Respondent

Cases Referred (5)

Related Judgments

Sanjay Prakash VS Union Of India - 2025 Supreme(SC) 916

Union of India VS Harananda - 2019 Supreme(SC) 1160

Jagat Singh Bhati vs Union of India - 2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5364

K.R.Joshi vs Union of India - 2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 535

SANJAY PRAKASH VS UNION OF INDIA - 2021 Supreme(SC) 315

3399/2025 - 2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 6060

Rajiv Kumar vs Government of India

Rajiv Kumar VS Government of India - 2021 Supreme(Del) 455

Cmdt Lal Singh Yadav VS Union Of India - 2021 Supreme(Del) 1620

Amit Sharma & Ors VS Union Of India & Ors - 2021 Supreme(Del) 2216

ABHAY S. OKA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Sanjay Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent