SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 1231

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.R. Shah, A.S. Bopanna, JJ.
Leelavati Devi @ Leelawati & Anr. - Petitioner
Vs.
The State Of Uttar Pradesh - Respondent
Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos. 3262 of 2021, IA No. 71552/2021
Decided On : 07-10-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Divyesh Pratap Singh, AOR
For the Respondents: Mr. Garvesh Kabra, AOR, Mr. Ajay Prajapati, Adv.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Anticipatory Bail - The petition for anticipatory bail was denied, as the court found no reason to allow the application - The High Court's order allowing for a delay in coercive action was deemed unsustainable and contrary to precedent set in 'M/s Neeharika Infrustructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra' (Para 3).

(B) The court criticized High Court practices of granting protection for anticipatory bail where entitlement was denied, reiterating that once an opinion is formed on non-entitlement, further delay in coercive action is legally untenable (Para 3).

Facts of the case:
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in the context of serious allegations; the High Court provided a 90-day protection period for applicants who surrendered.

Findings of Court:
The Special Leave Petition is disposed of with instructions communicated to the Allahabad High Court regarding unsustainable practices in anticipatory bail orders.

Issues: The sustainability of the High Court's order on anticipatory bail granted for 90 days despite denial of entitlement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that High Courts must not delay coercive action if anticipatory bail is not warranted, reinforcing legal precedents against such orders.

Result: Special Leave Petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. representation of petitioner's counsel (Para 1)
2. court's stance on anticipatory bail refusal (Para 2 , 3)
3. disposal of special leave petition and communication to high court (Para 4 , 5 , 6)

ORDER :

1. We have heard Shri Divyesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we see no reason to allow the application of the petitioners for anticipatory bail. However, it is observed that as and when the regular bail application is made, the same may be decided and disposed of at the earliest and preferably within a period of 48 hours from filing such an application and serving a copy of the same on the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Before parting, we are constrained to observe that the impugned order passed by the High Court insofar as passing the order that, in case the applicants appear and surrender before the Court within 90 days and apply for bail, and till then no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants is unsustainable and contrary to the decision of this Court in the case of M/s Neeharika Infrustructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Others , 2021 (5) Scale 610 . We deprecate such an order passed by the High Court. Once the High Court is of the opinion and so observed in the impugned order that the applicants are not entitled to be granted anticipatory bail and the offences alleged are made out from the allegations in the F.I.R., there was no question of granting further protection to the applicants/accused and that too for a period of 90 days and the order that no coercive action shall be taken for 90 days. Despite the judgment and order passed by this High Court in catena of decisions and, lastly, in the case of M/s Neeharika Infrustructure (supra) it is observed that many High Courts are passing such orders which are absolutely unsustainable and not tenable at law.

4. With this, the present Special Leave Petition is disposed of.

5. We direct the Registry to send and communicate this order to the Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court so that this order can be circulated amongst all the Judges of the Allahabad High Court.

6. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top