SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 973

SANDEEP MEHTA, PRASANNA B. VARALE
Aditi bhati – Appellant
Versus
Kamal singh bhati – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ratish Kumar Sharma, AOR, Mr. Ankit Kumar, Adv.

Table of Content
1. special leave petition against high court order. (Para 1)
2. court's reasons for not interfering with the order. (Para 2 , 3)
3. dismissal of petition due to lack of merit. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER :

2. We feel that the main application for stay preferred by the petitioners is still pending consideration and thus, the prayer for stay on the judgment of the trial Court can always be made before the High Court.

4. The special leave petition is dismissed as being devoid of merit.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top