SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1672

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, HIMA KOHLI
Directorate of Enforcement – Appellant
Versus
Anil Vasantrao Deshmukh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Advocate, Mr. Sudarshan K., Advocate, Mr. Rajat Nair, Advocate, Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Advocate, Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Advocate, For the Appellant / Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate, Ms. Manisha Singh, Advocate, For the Respondent.

ORDER

1. We are not inclined to entertain the special leave petition against the grant of bail by the High Court to the first respondent.

2. Since the observations in the impugned order of the High Court are confined to the question as to whether the respondent was entitled to the grant of bail, we clarify that these observations shall be construed only for that purpose. In other words, the observations shall not affect the merits of the trial or be pressed in any other collateral proceedings.

3. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed.

4. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top