Mohd. Tahir Hussain (in J. C. ) vs State of Nct of Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 1721

AJAY RASTOGI, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Mohd. Tahir Hussain (in J. C. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of Nct of Delhi – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Dr. Menaka Guruswamy, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Tara Narula, Advocate, Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Yash S. Vijay, Advocate, Mr. Utkarsh Pratap, Advocate, Ms. Sylona Mohapatra , Advocate, For the Appellant.

ORDER

1. The present petition has been filed assailing the interim order passed by the High Court dated 16.09.2022.

2. It reveals that taking note of the submissions made by the petitioner, which prima facie persuaded the High Court to issue notice to call upon the respondents and posted for hearing on 25.01.2023.

3. After hearing learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, we find no reason to interfere with the interim order, as the matter is still sub-judice before the High Court. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

4. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2022 Supreme(SC) 1721

AJAY RASTOGI, C. T. RAVIKUMARMohd. Tahir Hussain (in J. C. ) – AppellantVersusState of Nct of Delhi – Respondent

AJAY RASTOGI, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Mohd. Tahir Hussain (in J. C. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of Nct of Delhi – Respondent