J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Orissa High Court – Appellant
Versus
Banshidhar Baug – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court heard all parties and reviewed materials. (Para 1) |
| 2. high court's order quashed specific administrative rules. (Para 2 , 11) |
| 3. court stayed operations of high court’s order. (Para 3 , 8) |
| 4. petitioners argue high court lacked justification and authority. (Para 4) |
| 5. respondents raise concerns regarding fairness and transparency. (Para 5) |
| 6. responses discuss procedural validity of suo motu designations. (Para 6) |
| 7. various designations were challenged. (Para 7) |
| 8. court defines powers under section 16(2) of the advocates act. (Para 9) |
| 9. previous judgments addressed arbitrariness in designating senior advocates. (Para 10) |
| 10. impugned order details designation procedures and subsequent challenges. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 11. court reiterates need for transparency in designations. (Para 15) |
| 12. high court amended rules for alignment with directives. (Para 16) |
| 13. jurisdiction respect and amendments in designation practices necessary. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 14. designation privileges must be transparent and non-arbitrary. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
1. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for all the parties and perused the materials available on record.
3. On 02.08.2021, wh
Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India
Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India
The designation of Senior Advocates under the Advocates Act, 1961, is a privilege based on merit, requiring adherence to principles of fairness and transparency in the designation process.
Practice and Procedure - Appointment - Designation of "Senior Advocate” - When process under Rule- 6 was on, it was irregular on part of High Court to issue Notification. Instead of expanding ambit o....
The designation of Senior Advocates must prioritize objective assessments of ability and integrity, ensuring inclusivity while addressing concerns over arbitrary practices and the relevance of experi....
The designation of Senior Advocate is exclusively within the Full Court's authority, governed by established guidelines, and cannot be granted without following prescribed procedures.
Designation as Senior Advocates – Voting by secret ballot should not be rule but clearly an exception – Academic knowledge of law is an important prerequisite.
The designation of Senior Advocates by the High Court must follow principles of transparency and valid criteria as per the Advocates Act, 1961.
Rule 9B of the High Court of Delhi Designation of Senior Advocate Rules, 2024 is constitutional, as it distinguishes between judicial officers based on assessable performance, thus not violating Arti....
Designation of Advocates as Senior Advocates – Classification of Advocates and mechanism to grant seniority to Advocates is not based on any arbitrary, artificial or evasive grounds – Expertise and m....
Advocates-on-record must ensure accurate representation of facts in legal filings, with potential disciplinary actions for misrepresentation, highlighting the need for guidelines on their conduct.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.