Shiv Baran vs State Of U. P. - 2025 Supreme(SC) 1078

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(SC) 1078

SANJAY KAROL, JOYMALYA BAGCHI
Shiv Baran – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Gaurav, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, AOR Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Kumari, Adv. Mr. Shashank Pachauri, Adv. Mr. Anshuman Nayak, Adv. Mr. Rahul Kulhare, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, AOR Mr. Shoaib Ahmad Khan, Adv. Mr. Md. Anas Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Garausa, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Sharyab Ali, Adv. Ms. Shehla Chaudhary, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KAROL, J.

Leave Granted.

2. The instant appeal preferred by the appellant- complainant, arises out of judgment and order dated 23rd July 2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Revision No.5517 of 2023, quashing the summons issued against Rajendra Prasad Yadav, Respondent No.2 herein, under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973¹[Hereinafter ‘CrPC] vide order dated 28th September 2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kaushambi²[Hereinafter “Trial Court”] in Sessions Trial No.109 of 2018, arising out of Case Crime No.303 of 2017.

3. Brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are :

⁴

⁵

⁶