B. R. GAVAI, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Padi Kaushik Reddy Etc. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Telangana And Others Etc. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of election and disqualification petitions (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties’ contentions on delay and speaker's authority (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. court's analysis on parliamentary proceedings and past judgments (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94) |
| 4. judgment on judicial review and speaker's authority (Para 100) |
| 5. final orders by the court directing the speaker (Para 101 , 102 , 103 , 104) |
JUDGMENT :
(B.R. GAVAI, CJI.)
1. Leave granted in SLP (C) Nos. 2353-2354 of 2025 and SLP (C) Diary No. 14577 of 2025.
2. The appeals in the present set of matters challenge the judgment and final order dated 22nd November 2024 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad1[Hereinafter referred to as “the High Court”] in Writ Appeal Nos. 1157, 1158 and 116
Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu and Others
Rajendra Singh Rana and Others v. Swami Prasad Maurya and Others
Subhash Desai v. Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra and Others
Keisham Meghachandra Singh v. Speaker, Manipur Legislative Assembly and Others
S.A. Sampath Kumar v. Kale Yadaiah and Others
The Speaker must decide disqualification petitions within three months to uphold constitutional objectives and prevent political defections.
The Speaker has the exclusive authority to decide disqualification petitions under the Tenth Schedule, and must act within a reasonable time to uphold constitutional mandates.
Judicial review is permissible in disqualification matters, and the Speaker must decide petitions within a reasonable timeframe to uphold democratic principles.
(1) Political imbroglio in State Legislature of Maharashtra – Supreme Court cannot ordinarily adjudicate petitions for disqualification under Tenth Schedule in first instance. There are no extraordin....
Point of law: Election - Disqualification - No perversity - Speaker passed the impugned disqualification order after taking into consideration all the pleadings, newspaper reports, the photographs an....
Comparative Citation: 2011 (1) KCCR 476
Speaker discharges quasi-judicial function while adjudicating question of disqualification of a Member. Such decision is amenable to judicial review.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.