M. S. KARNIK, VALMIKI SA MENEZES
Girish Chodankar – Appellant
Versus
Speaker , Goa State Legislative Assembly – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's observations and directives (Para 1 , 3 , 20 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 32 , 37 , 39) |
| 2. factual background of the disqualification (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments related to timeliness and jurisdiction (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 16) |
| 4. ratio decidendi regarding disqualification petitions (Para 12 , 15 , 19 , 28) |
| 5. conclusion and order (Para 38) |
JUDGMENT/ORDER
M.S.KARNIK, J. - The judgment has been divided into the following Sec. to facilitate analysis:-

2. The petitioner, who is a former President of the Goa Pradesh Congress Committee of Indian National Congress, has petitioned this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondent no.1-Speaker Goa State Legislative Assembly to decide the disqualification petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent nos. 2 to 9, within time bound manner and more particularly within the period prescribed by law as laid down by the Supreme Court. The petitioner has placed heavy emphasis on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Keisham Meghachandra Singh vs. Hon'ble Speaker Manipur Legislative Assembly & ors., 2020 SCC OnLine SC 55. to contend that the disqualification

Haryana Vidhan Sabha vs. Kuldeep Bishnoi
Kuldip Singh vs. Subhash Chander Jain
M. S. Bhati vs. National Insurance Company Ltd
Manager National Insurance Ltd. vs. Sanju P. Paul
Manager National Insurance Ltd. vs. Sanju P. Paul
Mohini Jain (Miss) vs. State of Karnataka
P. Sudhakar Rao and Ors. vs. U. Govinda Rao
P. Sudhakar Rao and Others vs. U. Govinda Rao
Public Services Tribunal Bar Association vs. State of U.P.
Rajendra Singh Rana and Ors. vs. Swami Prasad Maurya
Rajendra Singh Rana and Ors. vs. Swami Prasad Mourya
S. Bhati vs. National Insurance Company Ltd
Shrimanth Balasaheb Patil vs. Karnataka Legislative Assembly
Speaker,Orissa Legislative Assembly vs. Utkal Keshari Parida
State of Maharashtra and Anr. vs. Sarva Shramik Sangh Sangli
State of Maharashtra and Anr. vs. Sarva Shramik Sangh, Sangli
The Speaker has the exclusive authority to decide disqualification petitions under the Tenth Schedule, and must act within a reasonable time to uphold constitutional mandates.
The Speaker must decide disqualification petitions within three months to uphold constitutional objectives and prevent political defections.
Judicial review is permissible in disqualification matters, and the Speaker must decide petitions within a reasonable timeframe to uphold democratic principles.
Comparative Citation: 2011 (1) KCCR 476
(1) Political imbroglio in State Legislature of Maharashtra – Supreme Court cannot ordinarily adjudicate petitions for disqualification under Tenth Schedule in first instance. There are no extraordin....
The scope of judicial review of an order passed by the Speaker under the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution of India is limited to grounds of malafides, perversity, violation of constitutional mandat....
Point of law: Election – Disqualification - No perversity - Speaker passed the impugned disqualification order after taking into consideration all the pleadings, newspaper reports, the photographs an....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.