PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, MANOJ MISRA
Delhi Pollution Control Committee – Appellant
Versus
Lodhi Property Co. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the case and background. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. application of pollution control laws. (Para 2) |
| 3. single judge’s unfavorable ruling on penalties. (Para 4) |
| 4. division bench upholds single judge's decision. (Para 5) |
| 5. arguments from both parties on regulatory powers. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. core question regarding powers of regulatory boards. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 7. distinction between restitution and punitive action. (Para 17 , 18 , 29) |
| 8. distinction between punitive measures and compensatory actions. (Para 20 , 27) |
| 9. court's conclusions regarding regulatory powers. (Para 28 , 30 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
JUDGMENT :
Contents | |
(1) | Introduction |
(2) | Facts |
(3) | Single Judge’s Judgment and Orders |
(4) | Impugned Order of the Division Bench |
(5) | Submissions |
(6) | Issue |
(7) | Existing Legal Regime for Pollution Control in India |
(8) | Insertion of Sections 33A & 31A in Water and Air Acts |
(9) | Interpretation of and for Environmental Institutions |
(10) | Duty to Restitute v. Power to Punish and Penalise |
(11) | Principles |
(A) Board’s Responsibility to Choose Appropriate Course of Action | |
(B) Powers Must Be Guided by Transparency and Non-Arbitrariness | |
(1) Introduction
1. The Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC)1 [DPCC is a regulator
Mafatlal Industries Ltd. and Others vs. UOI and Others
State of M.P. vs. Centre for Environment Protection Research and Development
Chandra Kishore Jha vs. Mahavir Prasad and Others
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action vs. Union of India
Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum vs. Union of India
Research Foundation for Science vs. Union of India
Deepak Nitrite Ltd. vs. State of Gujarat
The court established that environmental regulators can impose compensatory damages as preventive measures under the Water and Air Acts, distinct from punitive penalties, reinforcing the Polluter Pay....
The Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board lacks authority to impose environmental compensation without legislative backing and established procedures. Judicial pronouncements dictate the need for s....
The Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board cannot impose Environmental Compensation without legislative authority, necessitating subordinate legislation for its calculation and imposition.
Review not applicable to challenge prior statutory environmental compensation orders via Tribunal judgment lacking any such direction; must show patent error on record, not re-argue or substitute app....
Principles of natural justice must be followed in administrative decisions, granting parties the right to contest allegations, particularly when sanctions affect them materially.
The decision to prosecute for contravening the provisions of the Act is the power of the State Board alone, and the non-production of the resolution and/or decision of the Board to prosecute the resp....
CBWTFs must strictly comply with bio-medical waste rules; violations like improper storage, outdated incinerators, data tampering justify closure, environmental compensation with interest, and altern....
CBWTF held strictly liable for Bio-Medical Waste Rules violations including data tampering, improper storage, outdated incinerator; closure upheld, compensation with interest imposed till full remedi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.