SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1306

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, SUDHANSHU DHULIA
State Of Odisha – Appellant
Versus
Sushmi Supriya Mohapatra – Respondent


Table of Content
1. conditions for teacher selection advertised. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. need for adherence to selection criteria. (Para 7)
3. challenges regarding selected candidates' qualifications. (Para 8 , 9)
4. limitations on revising selection list post-appointment. (Para 10)
5. civil appeal disposed as infructuous. (Para 11)

ORDER :

2. The State of Odisha had advertised 1828 vacancies for Secondary School teachers in Government Schools in Odisha on 23.02.2019. Out of the 1828 vacancies, regular vacancies for Unreserved/SC/ST/SEBC were 253/81/113/57 respectively and unfilled vacancies of previous recruitment for Unreserved/SC/ST/SEBC were 662/215/298/149, respectively.

4. The respondent before this Court filed a writ petition before the High Court stating that she belongs to Unreserved Category and candidates belonging to Reserved Category have been appointed to posts for Unreserved candidates, which should not have been done as per the above-mentioned condition in the advertisement.

6. Unreserved Category. Consequently, the State of Odisha is before us in this Special Leave Petition.

8. However, it has been stated before this Court by the learned counsel representing the State of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top