SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1316

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. GAVAI AND AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ.
Vivek Kumar Gaurav – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7446 of 2024 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-02-2024 in WP(C) No. 1603/2024 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi]
Decided on : 14-02-2025

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Special Leave to Appeal - Legal provisions regarding victim's rights - The provision entitles the complainant/victim to receive a copy of the chargesheet but restricts appearance at the pre-charge stage - Court cannot direct legislature on enacting laws. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - The High Court and Supreme Court cannot compel the legislature to enact laws in a certain manner; thus, the court dismissed the special leave petition. (Para 4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner seeks rights concerning the victim's ability to access legal documents and participate in proceedings before charges are formally brought.

Findings of Court:
The court acknowledged the provisions within the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as addressing the petitioner's concerns but not fully meeting them.

Issues: The main issue was the scope of rights granted to victims/complainants, especially concerning pre-charge stage appearances.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that it lacks authority to compel legislative decisions and dismissed the petition as the concerns raised were legislative in nature and not judicial.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner entitled to chargesheet copy. (Para 1)
2. petitioner argues pre-charge rights insufficient. (Para 2)
3. court's limitation on legislative direction. (Para 3)
4. petition dismissed; pending applications disposed. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER :

1. Ms. Archana Dave Pathak, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondent states that the concern of the petitioner is taken care of in the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. It is stated that as per the provision contained therein the complainant/victim is entitled to get the copy of the chargesheet.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said provision does not take complete care of the petitioner, inasmuch as the complainant/victim would not be entitled to appear at a pre-charge stage.

3. The Parliament after considering various aspects has come up with a new enactment. In writ jurisdiction, neither the High Court nor this Court can direct the legislature to enact a law in a particular manner.

4. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain this petition. The special leave petition is, accordingly dismissed.

5. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top