SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1323

SANJAY KAROL, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Vinayak – Appellant
Versus
Manohar Singh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts surrounding the accident and initial compensation awarded. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. appeal and arguments for enhanced compensation. (Para 7 , 10)
3. court's reasoning on disability impact and compensation. (Para 11 , 12)
4. final compensation rights and judgment order. (Para 13 , 14)

ORDER

8 years 3 months 7 months 12 months

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 16th August, 2023 in Misc. Appeal No.410 of 2023 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore, which, in turn, was preferred against the judgment and order dated 27th October, 2022 passed in Claim Case No.1100258 of 2014 by the 11th Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal, Indore.

4. In connection with this incident, a report of the accident was lodged against one Amit (Respondent No.2), the driver of the offending vehicle at Police Station, MIG Colony, Indore.

6. The Tribunal, by its order, held that the insurance company was liable to pay an amount of Rs.17,65,813/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of payment. The Tribunal considered the permanent disability suffered by the appellant to be 70% and took his sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top