SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1323

SANJAY KAROL, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Vinayak – Appellant
Versus
Manohar Singh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts surrounding the accident and initial compensation awarded. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. appeal and arguments for enhanced compensation. (Para 7 , 10)
3. court's reasoning on disability impact and compensation. (Para 11 , 12)
4. final compensation rights and judgment order. (Para 13 , 14)

ORDER

Time taken for disposal of the claim petition Time taken for disposal of appeal by the High Court Time taken for disposal of the appeal in this Court

8 years 3 months 7 months 12 months

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 16th August, 2023 in Misc. Appeal No.410 of 2023 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore, which, in turn, was preferred against the judgment and order dated 27th October, 2022 passed in Claim Case No.1100258 of 2014 by the 11th Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal, Indore.

3. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that on 23rd March, 2014, the offending vehicle bearing No.MP-09-CM-2227, while coming from the Gurudwara side, rashly and negligently dashed into the claimant-appellant, who was standing near the service lane of the road at ABMEG Colony, Indore, near Gurudwara. Upon collision, he w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top