SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1370

ARAVIND KUMAR, J. K. MAHESHWARI
Parteek Arora @ Parteek Juneja – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Divya Gulati, Adv. and Mr. Sachin Saini, AOR

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and bail petitions (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. procedural history and withdrawal of bail applications (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's reasoning on anticipatory bail refusal (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. costs imposed on the petitioner (Para 11)
5. order for arrest and procedural directives (Para 12 , 13)

ORDER :

2. We have perused the documents placed before us and heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length.

    "After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the instant petition, at this stage.

    Dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage."

    "The FIR in the present case was registered on 25.06.2023. Thereafter for more than 01 year, no action was taken against the accused. Thereafter, the police started raising the house of the petitioner and apprehending his arrest, he had filed the anticipatory bail petition before this Court. However, this Court was not inclined to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and the same was withdrawn on 30.09.2024. Now a period of almost 03 months has elapsed but no steps have been taken by the police either to arrest the accused or to declare him a proclaimed offender. This clearly sh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top