SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1380

B. V. NAGARATHNA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Mukesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State through rep. , by the Inspector of Police – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to bail conditions imposed by high court. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. appellants contest imposition of bail condition. (Para 5)
3. court finds merit in deleting bail conditions. (Para 6 , 7)
4. conditions for bail must ensure cooperation in trial. (Para 8)
5. final ruling allows appeal with specified conditions. (Para 9)

ORDER :

2. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 05.07.2024 passed by the High Court of Madras, in Crl.O.P.No.14070 of 2024.

4. The High Court, vide impugned interim order dated 05.07.2024, granted interim anticipatory bail to the appellants herein and imposed multiple conditions upon the appellants for the same, amongst which a condition imposed by the High Court was as under:

5. Challenging the imposition of the aforesaid condition for grant of bail, the appellants have preferred the present criminal appeal.

7. Considering the facts on record, in our view, the case for deletion of the aforesaid condition for grant of anticipatory bail is made out.

It is directed that the appellants shall extend complete cooperation in the trial of the instant case. The appellants shall not misuse their liberty in any manner. The other conditions imposed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top