Based on the provided legal document, the key points are as follows:

1. The appellant was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, specifically Sections 311, 406, 420, and 120B, for offences involving cheating and conspiracy (!) (!) .

2. The investigation has been completed, and a charge-sheet has been filed, indicating that custodial interrogation of the appellant is no longer necessary (!) (!) .

3. The Court observed that once a charge-sheet is filed, custodial interrogation is generally unnecessary, and this fact influenced the decision to grant anticipatory bail (!) .

4. The impugned orders denying anticipatory bail were set aside, and anticipatory bail was granted to the appellants with the condition that they must appear before the Trial Court. Additionally, non-cooperation may lead to the bail being canceled (!) (!) .

5. The Court emphasized that the appellant's cooperation with the Trial Court proceedings is essential, and failure to cooperate may result in bail cancellation (!) .

6. The appeals were allowed, and the orders granting anticipatory bail were set aside, with new bail conditions imposed to ensure the appellant's cooperation (!) (!) (!) .

7. In the case involving the second appellant, considering the period of incarceration and the involvement in multiple cases, the Court also found it appropriate to set aside the impugned order and grant bail, subject to the conditions imposed by the Trial Court (!) (!) .

8. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly, and the appeals resulted in the granting of bail under the specified conditions (!) (!) .

9. The Court's decision underscores that once a charge-sheet is filed, custodial interrogation is unnecessary for bail considerations, and the focus shifts to ensuring cooperation and proper conduct during trial proceedings [paras 3, 4].

These points summarize the Court's reasoning and rulings regarding the grant of anticipatory bail in the context of completed investigation and filed charge-sheets.