SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1416

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL AND SANDEEP MEHTA, JJ.
Ram Sona - Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh - Respondent
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos.9884-9885 of 2021 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31-01-2020 in CRREF No. 02 of 2018 31-01-2020 in CRA No. 1517 of 2018 passed by the High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur]
Decided on : 09-01-2025

Headnote:(A) Capital punishment - Directions issued by the Supreme Court regarding the collection of reports relevant to mitigation during sentencing, specifically including probation officer reports, jail conduct reports, and psychological evaluations. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Mitigation Assistance - The court allows a legal professional to conduct interviews and gather personal documents of the appellant for mitigation purposes, ensuring confidentiality during the process. (Paras 3-8)

Facts of the case:
The appellant challenges decisions regarding capital punishment, with a focus on the collection of relevant reports from various authorities and professionals for the purpose of sentencing.

Findings of Court:
The Supreme Court mandated comprehensive assessments involving probation officers, jail conduct, and psychological evaluation of the appellant, and permitted a mitigation expert to assist in gathering information for sentencing.

Issues: The main issues included the appropriateness of reports related to the appellant's jail conduct and psychological assessment relevant to sentencing considerations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for detailed information to ensure fair sentencing in capital punishment cases and allowed for necessary mitigation assistance while ensuring confidentiality.

Result: Directions issued for compliance and future hearings scheduled.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1)
2. court's directives for compliance and reporting. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. scheduling future hearings. (Para 7)

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. It is submitted that original records of the case have been received from the Trial Court and the High Court. A copy of the translated records shall be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties, if not supplied earlier.

3. In view of the orders passed by this Court in matters involving capital punishment, we issue following directions:

    i. The respondent-State shall place before this Court the report(s) of all the Probation Officers relating to the appellant within a period of eight (8) weeks.

    ii. The Superintendent of Prison, Raipur Central Jail, shall submit a report with regard to the nature of work which has been performed by the appellant while in jail and a report with regard to the conduct and behaviour of the appellant while in jail, within a period of eight (8) weeks.

    iii. The Head of the Post Graduate Institute of Behavioral & Medical Science, Raipur, shall constitute a suitable team for the purpose of carrying out a psychological evaluation of the appellant. The report of the evaluation shall be submitted to this Court through the Standing Counsel for the State of Chhattisgarh within a period of eight (8) weeks.

    iv. Ms. Simran Narula, who is associated with Project 39A, National Law University, Delhi, is allowed to provide mitigation assistance to the Court.

    v. Ms. Simran Narula is permitted to have access to the appellant who is presently lodged in Raipur Central Jail to conduct multiple in-person interviews for the purpose of collecting information relevant to sentencing and to submit a Mitigation Investigation Report on behalf of the appellant through the appellant's Advocate-on-Record within ten (10) weeks.

    vi. The Raipur Central Jail shall ensure that, for the sake of confidentiality, these interviews are conducted in a separate interviewing space without any prison official or police staff being within earshot distance, and audio recorders be permitted to be used to record the interviews.

    vii. A person nominated by Ms. Simran Narula be permitted to accompany her to translate during the interview.

    viii. Ms. Simran Narula is granted permission to obtain documents pertaining to the appellant, including but not limited to medical records, jail conduct, certificates of any educational, vocational or employment opportunities undertaken, etc. that the appellant may wish to submit for the purpose of sentencing information.

4. The Registry is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the Standing Counsel for the State of Chhattisgarh, who shall, in turn, ensure that the order is communicated to the relevant authorities for compliance. The Registry shall, in addition, send a due intimation to all the concerned authorities immediately for compliance.

5. All the reports shall be duly compiled and placed before this Court on the next date of hearing.

6. I.A. Nos.195353 & 195354 of 2022 are, accordingly, disposed of.

7. List these matters after twelve (12) weeks along with the report(s).

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top