SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL AND SANDEEP MEHTA, JJ.
Mangesh Dattatraya Lonkar - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No(s). 293-294 of 2020
Decided on : 09-01-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. original records received; translations provided. (Para 1) |
| 2. court issues directions regarding evaluation and reports. (Para 2) |
| 3. reports to be compiled and hearing scheduled. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
ORDER :
1. It is submitted that original records of the case have been received from the Trial Court and the High Court. A copy of the translated records shall be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties, if not supplied earlier.
2. In view of the orders passed by this Court in matters involving capital punishment, we issue following directions:
ii. The Superintendent of Prison, Yerwada Central Jail, shall submit a report with regard to the nature of work which has been performed by the appellant while in jail and a report with regard to the conduct and behaviour of the appellant while in jail, within a period of eight (8) weeks.
iii. The Head of the Sassoon Medical Hospital, Pune, shall constitute a suitable team for the purpose of carrying out a psychological evaluation of the appellant. The report of the evaluation shall be submitted to this Court through the Standing Counsel for the State of Maharashtra within a period of eight (8) weeks.
iv. Ms. Devika Rawat, who is associated with Project 39A, National Law University, Delhi, is allowed to provide mitigation assistance to the Court.
v. Ms. Devika Rawat is permitted to have access to the appellant who is presently lodged in Yerwada Central Jail to conduct multiple in-person interviews for the purpose of collecting information relevant to sentencing and to submit a Mitigation Investigation Report on behalf of the appellant through the appellant's Advocate-on-Record within ten (10) weeks.
vi. The Yerwada Central Jail shall ensure that, for the sake of confidentiality, these interviews are conducted in a separate interviewing space without any prison official or police staff being within earshot distance, and audio recorders be permitted to be used to record the interviews.
vii. A person nominated by Ms. Devika Rawat be permitted to accompany her to translate during the interview.
viii. Ms. Devika Rawat is granted permission to obtain documents pertaining to the appellant, including but not limited to medical records, jail conduct, certificates of any educational, vocational or employment opportunities undertaken, etc. that the appellant may wish to submit for the purpose of sentencing information.
3. The Registry is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the Standing Counsel for the State of Maharashtra, who shall, in turn, ensure that the order is communicated to the relevant authorities for compliance. The Registry shall, in addition, send a due intimation to all the concerned authorities immediately for compliance.
4. All the reports shall be duly compiled and placed before this Court on the next date of hearing.
5. List these matters after twelve (12) weeks along with the report(s).
Crl.A. No. 295-296/2020
1. It is submitted that original records of the case have been received from the Trial Court and the High Court. A copy of the translated records shall be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties, if not supplied earlier.
2. In view of the orders passed by this Court in matters involving capital punishment, we issue following directions:
ii. The Superintendent of Prison, Yerwada Central Jail, shall submit a report with regard to the nature of work which has been performed by the appellant while in jail and a report with regard to the conduct and behaviour of the appellant while in jail, within a period of eight (8) weeks.
iii. The Head of the Sassoon Medical Hospital, Pune, shall constitute a suitable team for the purpose of carrying out a psycho
(1) Death Sentence (Capital Punishment) – Mitigating and aggravating circumstances – Report pertaining to aggravating and mitigating circumstances shall, as a matter of course, be called for by trial....
The court emphasized the importance of assessing the character and behavior of the accused, obtaining psychological evaluations, and allowing access to mitigating circumstances before making a final ....
The court emphasized the importance of a psychological evaluation and the collection of relevant information for sentencing purposes.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of assessing the character and behavior of the appellant and considering any mitigating circumstances before final disposal of a ....
(1) Video Conferencing – Act of securing presence of accused through video conferencing at the time of judicial remand for first time or police remand, is not a matter of course and it is to be exerc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.