SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1427

B. V. NAGARATHNA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Hasan Amir Raje – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal processes and procedural orders defined. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. conviction details of the appellant. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's reasoning for bail application. (Para 6 , 9 , 11)
4. arguments for and against bail suspension. (Para 7 , 8 , 10)
5. order granting bail to appellant. (Para 12)

ORDER :

2. Leave granted.

4. The appellant was convicted and sentenced vide order dated 10.04.2024 by the Additional Sessions Judge, at Ahmednagar in Sessions (MPID) Case No. 323/2011 under Sections 177 , 406, 409, 420, 465, 467, 471 read with Section 120-B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 ("IPC") along with Section 3 of the MPID ACT . The appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment concurrently for aforementioned offences with the maximum period of imprisonment of ten years.

6. We have heard learned senior counsel in support of the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent-State and perused the counter affidavit filed by the respondent-State.

8. Learned senior counsel drew our attention to the order dated 22.10.2024 of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench in Criminal Appeal No.426/2024 in support of his submission. It was also brought to our notice that this Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top