SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1427

B. V. NAGARATHNA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Hasan Amir Raje – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal processes and procedural orders defined. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. conviction details of the appellant. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's reasoning for bail application. (Para 6 , 9 , 11)
4. arguments for and against bail suspension. (Para 7 , 8 , 10)
5. order granting bail to appellant. (Para 12)

ORDER :

1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. This appeal challenges the order dated 10.05.2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad in Criminal Application No.1752 of 2024 in Criminal Appeal No.401 of 2024.

4. The appellant was convicted and sentenced vide order dated 10.04.2024 by the Additional Sessions Judge, at Ahmednagar in Sessions (MPID) Case No. 323/2011 under Sections 177 , 406, 409, 420, 465, 467, 471 read with Section 120-B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 ("IPC") along with Section 3 of the MPID ACT . The appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment concurrently for aforementioned offences with the maximum period of imprisonment of ten years.

5. Being aggrieved by the order of the Trial Court dated 10.04.2024, the appellant approached the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad by filing Criminal Appeal No.401 of 2024. Duri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top