SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 179

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DIPANKAR DATTA, MANMOHAN, JJ.
NITISH KUMAR @ PAPPU - Appellant
Versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 322 OF 2025 [arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 15541/2024]
Decided On : 21-01-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Anuja Pethia, AOR, Mr. Harshit Pandey, Adv., Mr. Noor Shergill, Adv., Ms. Kritika, Adv., Ms. Halen Maria, Adv., Mr. Supriya, Adv., Mr. Rishabh Govila, Adv., Mr. Rishabh Nigam, Adv., Mr. Srikant Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mrs. Archana Pathak Dave, A.S.G., Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR, Ms. Sonia Dhamija, Adv., Mr. Rajeev Kumar Ranjan, Adv., Mr. Jagdish Chandra Solanki, Adv.

The court granted bail pending appeal, emphasizing the right to appeal and the potential injustice of prolonged incarceration if the conviction is later overturned.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 354(A) and 354

(D) - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 9 and 10 - Appeal against conviction and sentence of 5 years’ imprisonment - Application for suspension of sentence rejected by High Court - Sufficient grounds established for suspension of sentence and release on bail during appeal pending - Justice must not be illusory if conviction is reversed later. (Paras 4, 6, 7)

(B) Right to appeal - Statutory right under Cr. PC - Early decision on appeal not likely due to burden on High Court judges - Bail granted pending appeal with conditions. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted and sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment for offences under IPC and POCSO Act. He filed an appeal against the conviction, which is pending before the High Court. An application for suspension of sentence was rejected by the High Court.

Findings of Court:
The appellant has been incarcerated for over two years and eight months, which is more than half of the sentence imposed. The court found sufficient grounds for bail pending appeal.

Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant should be granted bail pending the appeal against his conviction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of the right to appeal and the potential injustice of prolonged incarceration if the conviction were to be overturned later. The court ruled that the appellant should be released on bail pending the appeal.

Result: Appeal allowed.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant, having been convicted by the trial court for commission of offence punishable under Sections 354(A) / 354(D) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 9 / 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 and sentenced to 5 years’ simple imprisonment vide judgment and order dated May 06, 2023, filed an appeal1[CRL. A. 583/2023] before the High Court of Delhi2[High Court]. The appeal is pending.

3. In connection with the said appeal, the appellant applied under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19733[Cr. PC] for suspension of sentence and release on bail. Such application, however, has been rejected by the impugned judgment and order dated August 07, 2024 of the High Court. This appeal is directed against such rejection.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the materials on record, we are of the considered opinion that the appellant has made out sufficient ground for suspension of sentence and consequent release on bail, during the pendency of the appeal before the High Court.

5. We have noted that the appellant has been behind bars for two years and eight months as on date, i.e., for more than half of the prison term imposed by the trial court.

6. Right to appeal is a statutory right conferred by the Cr. PC. Having regard to the immense burden on Judges of the High Court hearing criminal appeals, any early decision on the appeal filed by the appellant does not seem to be a real possibility. Should relief claimed be not granted and the appellant made to suffer incarceration further and the prison term also gets over, justice could turn out to be illusory for him in the event the High Court, in future, were to reverse the conviction and set aside the same together with the sentence.

7. Having regard thereto, we set aside the impugned judgment and order. The appellant shall be released on bail subject to such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the trial court, pending decision on his appeal by the High Court.

8. Subject to its convenience, the roster bench of the High Court may expedite hearing of the appeal.

9. Needless to observe, the appellant shall diligently participate in the proceedings of the appeal. Should the appellant’s counsel remain absent without justifiable cause when the appeal is taken up for hearing or counsel engaged by him is not prepared to argue the appeal, the High Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the appellant.

10. We clarify that the observations made in this order and grant of bail will not be treated as findings on the merits of the case.

11. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed on the aforesaid terms.

12. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top