SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1389

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. NAGARATHNA AND SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, JJ.
Nitin Arjun More – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 280 of 2025 (@ Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 16572/2024)
Decided on : 20-01-2025

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 394, 395, 397, 120

(B) and 201 - Criminal bail application - Appellant, booked under serious offences, sought bail after prolonged custody since 19.08.2023, asserting co-accused had been granted bail - High Court rejected bail application, prompting appeal. (Paras 3, 4, 7)

(B) Bail - Considerations for grant - The weight of custody duration and the framing of charges were deemed significant factors, establishing merit for bail after evaluating the facts - The necessity of conditions to ensure presence at trial was recognized. (Paras 9, 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
The appellant had been in custody as an under-trial with charges filed but not framed. The appeal follows a High Court judgment denying bail, while co-accused were released.

Findings of Court:
Bail is warranted based on the duration of pre-trial detention and linked co-accused precedents.

Issues: The determination of bail conditions and the appropriateness of release, considering potential flight risk or witness tampering.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found the time in custody substantial enough to grant bail, emphasizing the importance of conditions to secure ongoing trial cooperation.

Result: Appeal allowed; bail granted with conditions.

Table of Content
1. challenge to bail application and factual setup. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court's reasoning for considering bail. (Para 6 , 9)
3. arguments for and against granting bail. (Para 7 , 8)
4. conditions and instructions regarding bail. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. final ruling on the appeal. (Para 14)

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 28.06.2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Bail Application No. 479 of 2024.

3. The appellant herein has been booked for the crime registered pursuant to FIR No. I-224 of 2023 dated 22.04.2023 lodged with Police Station Baramati Taluka, Pune, with respect to offences punishable under Sections 394 , 395, 397, 120(B) and 201 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860.

4. An application seeking regular bail having been rejected by the High Court vide impugned order dated 28.06.2024, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.

5. By order dated 22.11.2024, the following order was passed by this Court:

    "Delay condoned.

    Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 20.01.2025.

    Petitioner's counsel is also permitted to serve the standing counsel for the respondent-State."

6. Heard learned counsel for the appellant in support of the appeal and learned counsel for the State and perused the material on record.

7. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant has been in custody since 19.08.2023. Although, the Charge-sheet has been filed, the charges have not yet been framed. Therefore, the accused is in jail as an under-trial. Further, the co-accused has been granted the relief of bail. In the circumstances, the impugned order(s) may be set aside and relief of bail may be granted to this appellant also.

8. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that there is no merit in this appeal and objected to the grant of bail to the appellant herein.

9. Considering the facts on record, in our view, the case for bail is made out.

10. We, therefore, allow this appeal and direct as under:

    "The appellant shall be produced before the concerned Trial Court as early as possible and the Trial Court shall release him on bail, subject to such conditions as it may deem appropriate to impose to ensure his presence in the proceedings arising out of FIR No. I-224 of 2023 dated 22.04.2023 mentioned above." UL>

    11. It is directed that the appellant shall extend complete cooperation in the ensuing trial.

    12. The appellant shall not misuse his liberty and shall not in any way influence the witnesses or tamper with the material on record.

    13. Any infraction of the conditions shall entail cancellation of bail granted to the appellant.

    14. With the aforesaid directions, the criminal appeal is allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top