SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1389

B. V. NAGARATHNA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Nitin Arjun More – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to bail application and factual setup. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court's reasoning for considering bail. (Para 6 , 9)
3. arguments for and against granting bail. (Para 7 , 8)
4. conditions and instructions regarding bail. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. final ruling on the appeal. (Para 14)

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 28.06.2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Bail Application No. 479 of 2024.

3. The appellant herein has been booked for the crime registered pursuant to FIR No. I-224 of 2023 dated 22.04.2023 lodged with Police Station Baramati Taluka, Pune, with respect to offences punishable under Sections 394 , 395, 397, 120(B) and 201 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860.

4. An application seeking regular bail having been rejected by the High Court vide impugned order dated 28.06.2024, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.

5. By order dated 22.11.2024, the following order was passed by this Court:

    "Delay condoned.

    Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 20.01.2025.

    Petitioner's counsel is also permitted to serve the standing counsel for the respondent-State."

6. Heard learned counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top