SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1488

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Asha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Table of Content
1. fatal workplace incidents and governmental liability. (Para 1)
2. petitioners' demands for compensation. (Para 2 , 3)
3. need for government review of claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. directive for government compliance. (Para 7 , 8)
5. conclusion of proceedings and disposal of petition. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)

ORDER :

2. The petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution praying that both the Governments are liable to pay compensation for the death of their husbands while on duty.

    "(a) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No.1 to provide compensation of Rs. 30 Lakhs to the Petitioner No.1 in terms Of the judgment passed by this Hon'ble Court in the case titled as "Balram Singh vs. Union of India & Ors., 2023 SCC Online SC 1386";

    (b) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No.2 to enhance the compensation given to the Petitioner No.2 from Rs. 10 Lakhs to Rs. 30 lakhs and release the remaining amount of Rs. 20 Lakhs in terms of the judgment passed by this Hon'ble Court in the case titled

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top