Back
MANOJ MISRA, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
Basyaboina Tanish – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. permitting repeat examination under sop. (Para 2) |
| 2. counsels' arguments for education rights. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's order for examination facilitation. (Para 4) |
| 4. conclusion and disposal of appeal. (Para 5) |
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal is against the judgment and order passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad dated 22-10-2024 disposing of the Writ Petition No.13242/2024 with the following directions:
9. Since this Court is not inclined to promote the petitioner No.1 to Class X without the petitioner NO.1 clearing the examinations of Class IX, W.P.No.13242 of 2024 is
The court affirmed the right of students with disabilities to reattempt examinations with necessary exemptions, ensuring adherence to educational standards and fairness.
A student has the right to appear for examinations without coercive attendance requirements, particularly considering potential harm from institutional conduct.
State must consider CBSE policy relaxations when relying on its circulars for admission eligibility.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
