SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1589

N. KOTISWAR SINGH, SURYA KANT
Ashapura Vikas Samiti – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Ravi Shankar Jandhyala, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Ankita Chaudhary, Advocate, Mr. Vaibhav Dwivedi, Advocate, Ms. Diya Purohit, Advocate, Mr. Parmod Kumar Vishnoi, Advocate, Mr. Raghav Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Palash Pareek, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Milind Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Anuj Bhandari, Advocate, Mr. K.V. Mohan, Advocate, Mr. K.V. Balakrishnan, Advocate, Mr. Devesh Kumar Khanduri, Advocate, Mr. Vipin Sanghi, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Ramni Taneja, Advocate, Mr. Jaideep Singh, Advocate, Mr. Soumik Ghosal, Advocate, Ms. Mahima Singh, Advocate, Mr. Ramesh Chandra Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Parantap Singh, Advocate, Ms. Apoorva Jha, Advocate, Ms. S. Rohini, Advocate, Mr. Ashutosh Chaturvedi, Advocate and Mr. Anil Shrivastav, Advocate, for the Respondent.

Table of Content
1. controversy over land ownership and acquisition. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. claims contesting the validity of land transfer. (Para 7 , 8)
3. need for hearing all parties for proper adjudication. (Para 9 , 14)
4. process for disposing of appeals and maintaining status quo. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. no merit opinion on the case; instructions for high court. (Para 15 , 16)
6. disposal of applications alongside appeals. (Para 17 , 18)

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. Ashapura Vikas Samiti, a Housing Society, and one Pradeep Kumar Jain, claiming to be an office bearer of the aforesaid Society, are in appeal before us challenging the judgment and order dated 12.03.2018, passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, in DB Special Appeal Writ No. 373/2002 and connected matters, whereby the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 20.03.2002, passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2903/1994, was set aside and the matter was remitted to the learned Single Judge for a fresh adjudication of the above-stated Writ Petition.

3. The controversy revolves around a parcel of land situated in village Bhojpura, Tehsil and District Jaipur, Rajasthan, po

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top