Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, MANOJ MISRA
Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
G & T Beckfield Drilling Services Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
MANOJ MISRA, J.
1. Leave granted. This appeal arises from a judgment and order of the Gauhati High Court1[The High Court] dated 08.03.2019, whereby the appeal (i.e., Arb. A 3/2007) of the respondent, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19962[1996 Act], was allowed, the judgment and order of the District Judge, Sivasagar, dated 15.11.2007, in Misc. Arb Case No.26 of 2005, under Section 34 of 1996 Act, was set aside and the arbitral award dated 21.11.2004 was affirmed.
FACTS
2. Facts relevant for deciding this appeal are that the appellant suffered an arbitral award, dated 21.11.2004, passed by a three member arbitral tribunal, which directed as follows:
2(i) Claim No.2 relating to the 2nd invoice for dollar 20,729.17 being the outstanding balance is allowed rejecting the claim for interest thereon.
2(ii) Claim
(1) Post-award interest – If agreement stipulates that no interest is payable, Arbitral Tribunal cannot award interest for the period and an award contrary to terms of contract would be vulnerable to....
The arbitral tribunal can award pendente lite interest unless expressly prohibited by the contractual agreement.
The Arbitral Tribunal's authority to award interest is governed by the arbitration agreement, with specific provisions for pre-award and post-award interest under the Arbitration Act.
The Court can entertain challenges based on contract terms, and the applicability of contract clauses can influence the decision to set aside an arbitral award.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the directions for payment of interest in the impugned Award were contrary to the provisions of Section 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliat....
Union of India v. Bright Power Projects (India) Private Limited
-
Read summarySayeed Ahmed and Company v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
-
Read summarySree Kamatchi Amman Constructions v. Divisional Railway Manager (Works), Palghat and others
-
Read summaryGarg Builders v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
-
Read summaryJaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) through its Director v. Tehri Hydro Development Corporation (India) Ltd. (THDC)
-
Read summaryPam Developments Private Limited v. State of West Bengal and another
-
Read summaryR.P. Garg v. Chief General Manager, Telecom Department and Others
-
Read summaryIrrigation Deptt., State of Orissa v. G.C. Roy
-
Read summaryUnion of India v. Ambica Construction
-
Read summaryDhenkanal Minor Irrigation Division v. N.C. Budharaj
-
Read summaryAmbica Construction v. Union of India
-
Read summaryReliance Cellulose Products Limited v. Oil And Natural Gas Corporation
-
Read summaryFerro Concrete Construction (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.