J. B. PARDIWALA, SANDEEP MEHTA
Govindappa Gounder @ Govindasamy (Dead) – Appellant
Versus
K. Vijayakumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common judgment for related appeals. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background on original suits and appeals. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. proceedings details leading to second appeal. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. revenue court's findings on tenant's actions. (Para 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 5. interpretation of section 3(2)(b) of the act 1955. (Para 16 , 17 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. beneficial construction of the act to protect tenants. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. final ruling and orders issued. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned appeals are same and the challenge is also to the self same judgment and order passed by the High Court, those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. For the sake of convenience, we treat the Civil Appeal Nos. 7464-7466/2011, which are notified today at Serial No.103 of the cause list as the lead matter.
3. These appeals arise from the common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 18.11.2009, by which the Second Appeal filed by the respondents herein (original plaintiffs) came to be allowed thereby set asiding the judgment and decree dated 18.1
G. Ponniah Thevar v/s Nalleyam Perumal Pillai & Ors. reported in (1977)1 SCC 500 [Para 23]
The court ruled that without concrete evidence of negligence causing injury to the land, cultivating tenants cannot be evicted, affirming protective intent of tenant laws.
Late payment of lease rent is a valid ground for eviction under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955.
Sub-tenants cannot assume the status of cultivating tenants if the original tenants violated lease conditions by transferring rights without landlord's consent, as per tenant protection laws.
Admission of rent payment to the landlord's family member established the landlord's title, and the tenant's default in rent payment made him liable for eviction under the Act.
Eviction for rent default invalid without prior direction to pay under S.3(4)(b); upheld for land disuse based on inspection report.
Tenancy rights under Section 5 of the Karnataka Rent Act are inheritable only for five years post-death, and failure to pay rent for five years constitutes grounds for eviction.
The court emphasized tenant protection under the Puducherry Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, ruling that eviction requires substantial proof of abandonment and adherence to procedural safeguards b....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.