SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1714

J. B. PARDIWALA, SANDEEP MEHTA
Govindappa Gounder @ Govindasamy (Dead) – Appellant
Versus
K. Vijayakumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. N. Rajaraman, AOR Mr. T. V. George, AOR Mr. Pankaj Bist, Adv. Mr. Vijay Rawat, Adv. Mr. Karan Chauhan, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR Mr. Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Y. Lokesh, Adv. Mr. V. Kandha Prabhu, Adv. Ms. Maitri Goal, Adv. Ms. Dhatri Singh, Adv. Mr. Guneswaran Pv, Adv. Mr. N. Rajaraman, AOR Mr. I.V Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. Ms. Renu, Adv. Mr. Swagata Gupta, Adv. Ms. Shivani Verma, Adv. Ms. Pragya Jaishwal, Adv. Ms. Chandana Debnath, Adv. Mr. Nitin Kumar Nayak, Adv. Mr. Piyush, Adv. Mr. Anurag Ojha, AOR Ms. Samishti Solomon, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Sarup, Adv.

Table of Content
1. common judgment for related appeals. (Para 1 , 2)
2. background on original suits and appeals. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. proceedings details leading to second appeal. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. revenue court's findings on tenant's actions. (Para 14 , 15 , 18)
5. interpretation of section 3(2)(b) of the act 1955. (Para 16 , 17 , 20 , 21)
6. beneficial construction of the act to protect tenants. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
7. final ruling and orders issued. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT :

1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned appeals are same and the challenge is also to the self same judgment and order passed by the High Court, those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2. For the sake of convenience, we treat the Civil Appeal Nos. 7464-7466/2011, which are notified today at Serial No.103 of the cause list as the lead matter.

3. These appeals arise from the common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 18.11.2009, by which the Second Appeal filed by the respondents herein (original plaintiffs) came to be allowed thereby set asiding the judgment and decree dated 18.1

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top