Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI
Satchithanandum, (Died.) – Appellant
Versus
Krishnamurthy, (Died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petition and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contentions on payment of arrears and orders issued. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments against eviction due to failure to fix fair rent. (Para 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. impact of landlord's actions and tenant's compliance. (Para 15 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. legal standards for eviction procedure and tenant protection. (Para 23 , 24 , 29 , 34 , 39) |
| 6. final order to restore tenant possession. (Para 40) |
ORDER :
The unsuccessful cultivating tenant is the revision petitioner, aggrieved by the order passed in PCTPA No.1 of 2001 by the Revenue Court, Sub-Division (South), Villianur, Puducherry.
3.Ms.Gopika Nambiar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners in the revision, Satchithanandum and the 1st respondent, Krishnamurthy died pending PCTPA .No.1 of 2001. Inviting my attention to the application filed by the said Satchithanandum, the cultivating tenant in .No.7 of 1990, seeking permission to deposit the rent and the order passed in the said proceedings on 16.07.1990, the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the payment of arrears of Rs.8,100/- was recorded and on 20.08.1999, a memo
The court emphasized tenant protection under the Puducherry Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, ruling that eviction requires substantial proof of abandonment and adherence to procedural safeguards b....
Late payment of lease rent is a valid ground for eviction under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955.
The court upheld the Tribunal's order for payment of rent arrears under Order 15-A of CPC, emphasizing the necessity of summary enquiry for disputed amounts.
The court emphasized that the discretionary power under Order XV Rule 5 of the CPC must be exercised judiciously, particularly in cases of non-payment of rent, reflecting the parties' conduct.
High Court could not have re-appreciated the evidence and the concurrent findings rendered by the courts below ought not to have been interfered with by the High Court while exercising revisional jur....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
