J. K. MAHESHWARI, VIJAY BISHNOI
Legislative Council U. P. Lucknow – Appellant
Versus
Sushil Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.K. MAHESHWARI, J.
1. In this batch of appeals, the common order dated 18.09.2023 passed in Special Appeal Defective No. 485 of 2023 and Writ Appeal No. 140 of 2022 along with order dated 03.10.2023 passed in Civil Miscellaneous Review Application No. 117 of 2023 in Special Appeal Defective No. 485 of 2023 by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, have been assailed. For the sake of convenience, the parties in the instant appeals are outlined below as thus:
| Civil Appeal | Parties | Impugned order |
| C.A. No. 11842/2025 | Legislative Council, U.P. and Others Vs. Sushil Kumar & Ors. | Special Appeal Defective No. 485/2023 |
| C.A. No. 11843/2025 | Legislative Council, U.P. and Others Vs. Sushil Kumar & Ors. | Civil Miscellaneous Review Application No. 117 of 2023 in Special Appeal Defective No. 485 of 2023 |
| C.A. No. 11844-11845/2025 | State of Uttar Pradesh and Another Vs. Sushil Kumar and Others | Special Appeal Defective No. 485/2023 AND Civil Miscellaneous Review Application No. 117 of 2023 in Special Appeal Defective No. 485 of 2023 |
| C.A. No. 11846/2025 | State of |
Sachin Kumar and Others vs. Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board (DSSSB) and Others
Secretary, Minor Irrigation & Rural Engg. Services U.P. vs. Sahgoo Ram
Shree Shree Ram Janki, Asthan Tapovam Mandir vs. State of Jharkhand
State of W.B. vs. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights
Minor Irrigation & Rural Engg. Services, U.P. vs. Sahngoo Ram Arya
State of W.B. vs. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.