DIPANKAR DATTA, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Alchemist Hospitals Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
ICT Health Technology Services India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's appeal arises from a high court judgment dismissing an arbitration application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. dispute resolution process outlined in agreement clause focused on negotiation and mediation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. key issue is validity of clause 8.28 as an arbitration agreement under a&c act. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. definition and requirements for an 'arbitration agreement' under a&c act established. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court reviews arbitration agreement validation requirements. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. interpretation of agreement clause regarding arbitration leads to conclusions on intent. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. court emphasizes intent interpretation over mere terms usage in arbitration clauses. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. indications of non-binding arbitration process in clause 8.28 noted. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 9. correspondence post-notice does not validate a non-existent arbitration agreement. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 10. final ruling reaffirms lack of binding arbitration agreement and dismisses appeal. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 11. appeal dismissed, parties directed to seek remedies in civil court. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
DIPANKAR DATTA, J.
1. Leave granted.
Smt. Rukmanibai Gupta v. Collector, Jabalpur & Ors.
Jagdish Chander v. Ramesh Chander
Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. v. IVRCL AMR Joint Venture
Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. v. E.S. Solar Power (P) Ltd.
Wellington Associates Ltd. v. Kirit Mehta
Bihar State Mineral Development Corporation v. Encon Builders
BGM and M- RPL-JMCT (JV) v. Eastern Coalfields Limited
Powertech World Wide Ltd. v. Delvin International General Trading LLC
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.