SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. GAVAI, CJI, K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
IN RE : DELHI RIDGE
T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Others – Respondents
I.A. NO. 117204 OF 2024 (CEC REPORT No. 5 of 2024) in WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 202 OF 1995 and Issue regarding order dated 16th April 2025 passed in Writ Petition (c) No. 4677 of 1985
Decided On : 11-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. adjudication of authorities regulating the delhi ridge (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. importance of the delhi ridge (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. recognition of morphological ridge for protection (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. foundation and function of drmb (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. multiple oversight authorities for ridge management (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. conflicting orders and need for unified authority (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. current issues regarding notification and encroachments (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. statutory backing important for drmb (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 9. need for accountability and transparency in environmental governance (Para 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 10. establishment and role of standing committee for drmb (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 11. functions of the drmb outlined (Para 53 , 54) |
| 12. conclusions and directives for drmb (Para 57) |
JUDGMENT :
B.R. GAVAI, CJI
Table of Contents
| INTRODUCTION |
| History of the Delhi Ridge |
| Importance of the Ridge |
| Morphological Ridge |
| History of DRMB |
| Working of the DRMB |
| Multiple Authorities Supervising Ridge |
| DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
| Status of Final Notification under Section 20 |
| Removal of Encroachments |
| Identification of the Morphological Ridge |
| Reconstitution of the DRMB |
| Statutory Backing of DRMB |
| Representative of CEC in DRMB |
| Standing Committee for DRMB |
| Functions of the DRMB |
| CONCLUSION AND DIRECTIONS |
INTRODUCTION
1. In the present matter, we are called upon to adjudicate on the issue concerning the various bodies/authorities monitoring, regulating and permitting construction activities in the Delhi Ridge which is an area of vital ecological and geographical significance in the National Capital Territory1[For short, “the NCT”]. The Delhi Ridge which is at the tail end of the Aravali Ranges, contains a variety of flora and fauna and is widely known as the “Green Lungs” of the city.
History of the Delhi Ridge
2. The Aravali Range in the NCT of Delhi comprises of the rocky outcrop stretching from the Delhi University in the North to the NCT Border in the South and beyond, with sizable areas of the same having been designated as the Ridge. However, the Ridge, as it stands today, is not a continuum as various intervening stretches have been urbanized with the passage of time. For example, the Central Ridge area was planned as an integral part of capital city of New Delhi in the early part of the twentieth century.
3. The Master Plan for Delhi, 2001 notified on 1st August 1990 identifies the Delhi Ridge as an area admeasuring 7,777 hectares of land, which is divided in four zones, i.e., Northern, Central, South Central (Mehrauli) and Southern. Over the time, due to deterioration in the Ridge area, the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi constituted a 10-member committee known as the “Lovraj Committee” for preparing a management plan of the Ridge. The said committee inter alia suggested the creation of a Ridge Management Supervisory Committee chaired by the Chief Secretary of Delhi to address land-related legal matters. It was suggested that the entire Ridge area be notified as “Reserved Forest” under the Indian FOREST ACT , 19272[Hereinafter referred to as, “the FOREST ACT ”.]
4. Pursuant to the Lovraj Committee’s Report, a preliminary notification under Section 4 of the FOREST ACT was issued on 24th May 1994 thereby declaring 7,777 hectares of land as Reserved Forests. The Additional District Magistrate (Revenue)3[For short, “ADM (Revenue)”] was appointed to be the Forest Settlement Officer under the said notification. Though a period of more than three decades has passed, no further proclamation under Section 6 of the FOREST ACT has been issued thus far. Since then, only an area to the extent of 103.48 hectares has been notified as Reserved Forests under Section 20 of the FOREST ACT .
5. One more notification under Section 4 of the FOREST
Delhi Development Authority v. Kenneth Builders & Developers (P) Ltd.
T.N.Godavarman v. Union of India and others
Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Bar Association and Another v. Union of India and Another
T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (In Re: Gaurav Kumar Bansal)
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.