SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 2015

VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA
Govind Mandavi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mrs. Pragya Baghel, AOR Mr. Azad Bansala, Adv. Mr. Yuvraj Kashyap, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar Umrao, AOR

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Mehta, J.

1. Heard.

2. Leave granted.

3. The appellant-Govind Mandavi1[Hereinafter, referred to as the “accused-appellant”.], along with co-accused Narender Nag and Mansingh Nureti (both of whom stand acquitted by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur2[Hereinafter, referred to as the “High Court”.]), were put to trial before the learned Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, North Bastar, Kanker3[Hereinafter, referred to as the “trial Court”.], in Special Penal Case No. 65 of 2021. Upon conclusion of the trial, vide judgment and order dated 28th January, 2023, the accused- appellant and co-accused Mansingh Nureti were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 and 460 of the Indian Penal Code, 18604[For short, ‘IPC’.], and were sentenced in the following manner:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top