SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1855

PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, SANDEEP MEHTA
Angad Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Company Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, AOR
For the Respondent: Mr. S.K. Ray, Adv., Ms. Neetika Chaturvedi, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Swarup, Adv., Mr. Mohit Chaturvedi, Adv., Mr. Chetan Sharma, Adv., M/s. Manoj Swarup And Co., AOR

Table of Content
1. overview of compensation claim and previous rulings. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. argument for minimum wage as income basis. (Para 5)
3. court's decision to enhance compensation. (Para 6)
4. final order for compensation payment. (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER :

2. This appeal arises from the decision of the High Court in First Appeal from Order No.747/2013 dated 31-05-2022.

4. In appeal, the High Court enhanced the compensation to a sum of Rs.5,96,000/-.

6. Taking into account the age of the deceased, and considering the monthly income to be Rs. 6000/- we grant an overall enhancement of the compensation to Rs. 4 lakhs, which will be over and above what the High Court has granted.

8. The Civil Appeal is allowed accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top