SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1717

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VIVEK AGARWAL, J.
Smt. Poonam And Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Mohd. Jameel And Ors. – Respondents
First Appeal From Order No.1627 of 2016
Decided on : 19-01-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vidya Kant Shukla
For the Respondent: Amit Singh

Calculation of pecuniary compensation in motor accident claims considering minimum wages, dependency, and application of the multiplier.

Headnote:

Minimum Wages - Motor Accident Compensation - The court considered the minimum wages for an unskilled laborer and the dependency of the deceased's family to calculate the pecuniary compensation. The court also applied the multiplier of 16 for the deceased's age and awarded additional non-pecuniary compensation, resulting in a significant enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal.

Fact of the Case:

The claimants appealed the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal on the grounds of computation of the deceased's income, application of the multiplier, and the amount awarded under the conventional head.

Finding of the Court:

After considering the minimum wages, dependency of the deceased's family, and applying the multiplier of 16, the court enhanced the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal and directed investment of a portion of the additional amount for future use.

Issues: Computation of the deceased's income, application of the multiplier, and the amount awarded under the conventional head.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the minimum wages for an unskilled laborer, dependency of the deceased's family, and applied the multiplier of 16 to calculate the pecuniary compensation. Additionally, the court awarded non-pecuniary compensation and directed investment of a portion of the additional amount for future use.

Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of, and the claimants were entitled to a significant enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal, along with the direction for investment of a portion of the additional amount for future use.

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal has been filed by the claimants being aggrieved by award dated 11.2.2016 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No. 10, Kanpur Nagar in MACP No. 1289 of 2014 on the ground of computation of the income of the deceased at Rs. 3000/-against established norms of minimum wages, in absence of established proof of income future prospects have not been awarded and under the conventional head only a sum of Rs. 15,000/-has been awarded which will be to the tune of Rs. 70,000/-,

2. It is fairly submitted that age of the deceased at the time of accident was 35-years, therefore, multiplier of 16 will be applicable and not of 17 as has been applied by the Claims Tribunal.

3. Sri Amit Singh, learned counsel for the Insurance Company submits that no interference is required in the impugned award.

4. After hearing counsel for the parties and going through the record, it is apparent that minimum wages for an unskilled labourer engaged in the work of automobile repair as notified by the State of Uttar Pradesh w.e.f. October, 2013 to March, 2014 was to the tune of Rs. 200/-per day or Rs. 6000/-per month. When this is taken into consideration then looking to the facts that there are 3 dependents on the deceased namely his wife and two children, 1/3rd deduction is to be made towards the amount presumed to have been spent by the deceased on self. Therefore, monthly dependency will come out to Rs. 4000/-per month on which when 40% is added towards future prospects in the light of law laid down in case of National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and others as reported in (2017) 16 Supreme Court Cases 680; then monthly dependency will come to Rs. 5600/-or Rs. 67,200/-per year. When multiplier of 16 is applied then total pecuniary compensation will come to Rs. 10,75,200/-. Over and above, which claimants are entitled to a sum of Rs. 70,000/-under the head of non pecuniary compensation taking total compensation to Rs. 11,45,200/-in place of compensation of Rs. 4,74,000/-awarded by the Claims Tribunal. Therefore, there will be enhancement to the tune of Rs. 6,71,200/-to which claimants will be entitled in addition to the amount awarded by the Claims Tribunal. This additional amount will also carry interest at the rate of 7% from the date of filing of the claim petition. It is directed that a sum of Rs. 6,50,000/-out of this additional amount be invested in the monthly recurring deposit scheme of Indian post office or in a scheduled Bank for a period of 5 years so that principal amount remains intact to be used in future. Claimants are entitled to accrued interest and use it for immediate need.

5. In above terms, the appeal is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top