SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, JJ.
Dr. S. Mohan – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary To The Chancellor, Puducherry Technological University, Puducherry & Ors Etc. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No(s). 54-55 of 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C.) No. 4593-4594 of 2024)
Decided On : 30-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. constitutional framework for vice-chancellor appointment (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. challenges to appellant's appointment under ugc regulations (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. ugc regulations enforceability and state action limits (Para 15 , 30 , 40) |
| 4. appellant's arguments against high court's ruling (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. respondent's perspective on educational standards legislation (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. judicial reasoning validating high court's findings (Para 31 , 32 , 44 , 46) |
| 7. court's directive on appellant's tenacity in position (Para 52 , 54 , 55) |
JUDGMENT :
Mehta, J.
1. Heard.
2. The appellant, Dr. S. Mohan1[Hereinafter, referred to as “appellant”.], has approached this Court by way of the instant appeals with special leave, under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, 19502[Hereinafter, referred to as “Constitution”.], for assailing the common judgment and order dated 19th December, 2023, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras3[Hereinafter, referred to as “High Court”.] in Writ Petition Nos. 28147 of 2022 and 4174 of 2023, whereby the High Court allowed the two separate writ petitions filed by the Petitioners therein, i.e., respondent No. 2 in Civil Appeal No. 54 of 2025 and respondent No. 1 in Civil Appeal No. 55 of 2025, and set aside the appointment of the appellant as the Vice-Chancellor of the Puducherry Technological University4[Hereinafter, referred to as “the University”.]. However, the High Court, in order to avoid a vacuum, permitted the appellant to continue in office until a duly selected incumbent assumes charge in accordance with law or until 30th June, 2024, whichever was earlier. The said common judgment and order dated 19th December, 2023, is the subject matter of challenge in these appeals by special leave.
3. While entertaining the special leave petitions, this Court vide order dated 26th February, 2024 issued notice and stayed the operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 19th December, 2023 and as a consequence, the appellant continues to hold the post of the Vice-Chancellor. His tenure of five years ends in December, 2026.
BRIEF FACTS
4. Succinctly stated, the facts relevant and essential for disposal of these appeals are noted hereinbelow.
5. The Legislative Assembly of the Union Territory of Puducherry, in exercise of its legislative powers under Article 246 read with Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, enacted the Puducherry Technological University Act , 20195[Hereinafter, referred to as “PTU Act”.], which received the assent of the Hon’ble President on 31st March, 2020, thereby establishing the Puducherry Technological University under Section 3 of the PTU Act.
6. According to Section 14 of the PTU Act, the Vice- Chancellor shall be a whole-time officer of the University and shall be a person of academic eminence, competence, integrity, moral standing, and institutional commitment, to be appointed in accordance with the qualifications and norms prescribed in the Statutes. The appointment shall be made from a panel of three names recommended by the Search-cum-Selection Committee constituted under Section 14 (5), and such panel shall not include the name of any member of the said Committee. The identification of candidates for inclusion in the panel shall be carried out by the Search-cum-Selection Committee through a public notification, or by nomination, or through a talent-search process, or by a combination thereof. The members of the Search- cum-Selection Committee shall be persons of eminence in the fields of Engineering, Technology, Management, and Advanced Sciences, and shall not, in any manner, be connected with the University.
7. Section 14 (5) of the PTU Act lays down the composition of the Search-cum-Selection Committee referred to above, and the same is reproduced hereinbelow for ready reference:
Kaiser-I-Hind Pvt. Ltd. & Another v. National Textile Corporation (Maharashtra North) Ltd. & Others
Dr. Preeti Srivastava v. State of M.P.
Gambhirdhan K. Gadhvi v. State of Gujarat
Rajiv Sarin & Another v. State of Uttarakhand & Others
R. Chitralekha v. State of Mysore
Modern Dental College v. State of M.P.
T.N. Medical Officers’ Association v. Union of India
Gujarat University, Ahmedabad v. Krishna Ranganath Mudholkar
University of Delhi v. Raj Singh
State legislation cannot override UGC standards in higher education. The appellant's appointment was invalid as the Search Committee did not comply with UGC Regulations, but he is allowed to continue....
Appointment as Vice-Chancellor of University – While preparing panel, Search Committee must give proper weightage to academic excellence; exposure to higher education system in country and abroad, an....
The appointment of Vice-Chancellors must comply with statutory provisions and UGC regulations, ensuring lawful and independent decision-making by the Chancellor.
Appointment as Vice-Chancellor of University – Post of Vice-Chancellor of University is a very important post and most meritorious person should be appointed as Vice-Chancellor of University from and....
The amendments to State university Acts, removing Vice-Chancellor appointment power from the Chancellor to the Government, were found unconstitutional for conflicting with UGC Regulations, which have....
The amendments transferring Vice-Chancellor appointment authority from Chancellor to State Government are unconstitutional as they conflict with UGC Regulations, which prevail under Article 254 of th....
The appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of a University must be made in accordance with the UGC Regulations, 2010, which are mandatory and binding on the State Government. A person who is connected wi....
It is trite and settled law that a writ of quo warranto can be issued in the case of appointment of like nature which is contrary to the statute.
First choice in Section 13(7) of “Act” is Vice Chancellor of any other University in Kerala; and admittedly, all such persons are fully qualified in terms of both experience and educational qualifica....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.