IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. R. Swaminathan, V. Lakshminarayanan
K.Venkatachalapathy @ Kutty, S/o.Karuppasamy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamilnadu, Rep By Its Chief Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. constitutional validity of university amendments. (Para 18) |
| 2. supreme court's precedence in university governance. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. repugnancy between state amendments and established laws. (Para 22 , 23 , 26 , 30) |
| 4. court's authority and urgency in constitutional matters. (Para 31) |
| 5. stay granted to unconstitutional amendments. (Para 34) |
ORDER :
G.R.Swaminathan J.
The petitioner herein is a practising lawyer. He filed this writ petition in public interest questioning the constitutional validity of the impugned Acts amending some of the provisions of the following Acts:
1. The Tamil Nadu Fisheries University Act, 2012.
2. The Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University Act, 1989.
3. The Madurai-Kamaraj University Act, 1965
4. The Anna University Act, 1978
5. The Bharathiar University Act, 1981
6. The Bharathidasan University Act, 1981
7. The Mother Teresa Women's University Act, 1984
8. The Alagappa University Act, 1985
9. The Manonmaniam Sundaranar University Act 1990
10.The Periyar University Act, 1997
11.The Tamil Nadu Open University Act, 2002
12.The Thiruvalluvar University Act, 2002
13.The Tamil Nadu Teachers Education University Act, 2008
14.The Annamalai Uni
Gambhirdhan K Gadhvi -vs- State of Gujarat
State of West Bengal -vs- Anindya Sundar Das and Others
Jagdish Prasad Sharma and Others -Vs- State of Bihar and Others
Kalyani Mathivanan -vs- KV Jeyaraj and Others
Dr.Jaya Thakur and Others -vs- Union of India and Others
Jagdish Prasad Sharma and Others
Kalyani Mathivanan -vs- KV Jeyaraj
Gambhirdhan K Gadhvi -vs- State of Gujarat (2022)
Narendra Singh Bhandari -vs- Ravindra Jugran
Jagdish Prasad Sharma vs State of Bihar
Rakesh Vaishnav -vs- Union of India
The amendments transferring Vice-Chancellor appointment authority from Chancellor to State Government are unconstitutional as they conflict with UGC Regulations, which prevail under Article 254 of th....
The amendments to State university Acts, removing Vice-Chancellor appointment power from the Chancellor to the Government, were found unconstitutional for conflicting with UGC Regulations, which have....
The appointment of Vice-Chancellors must comply with statutory provisions and UGC regulations, ensuring lawful and independent decision-making by the Chancellor.
Appointment as Vice-Chancellor of University – While preparing panel, Search Committee must give proper weightage to academic excellence; exposure to higher education system in country and abroad, an....
State legislation cannot override UGC standards in higher education. The appellant's appointment was invalid as the Search Committee did not comply with UGC Regulations, but he is allowed to continue....
Appointment as Vice-Chancellor of University – Post of Vice-Chancellor of University is a very important post and most meritorious person should be appointed as Vice-Chancellor of University from and....
The appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of a University must be made in accordance with the UGC Regulations, 2010, which are mandatory and binding on the State Government. A person who is connected wi....
The UGC Regulations-2010, while important, are not mandatory for all universities and higher educational institutions, and the expertise of the search committee in making selections is crucial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.