SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 179

B. V. NAGARATHNA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Sushil Kamalnayan Bharuka – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Devdatt Palodkar, Adv. Mr. Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar, AOR Mr. Anoop Raj, Adv. Mr. Chirag Zanwar, Adv. Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sandesh Deshpande, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar Chowdhary, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, AOR Mrs. Sangeeta Nenwani, Adv. Ms. Revati Pravin Kharde, Adv. Mr. Shreenivas Patil, Adv. Mr. Rahul Prakash Pathak, Adv. Mr. Devdatt Palodkar, Adv. Mr. Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar, AOR Mr. Anoop Raj, Adv. Mr. Chirag Zanwar, Adv. Mr. Abhikalp Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Ms. Aagam Kaur, Adv. Mr. Kartikey, Adv. Ms. Gayatri Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Utkarsh Kumar, Adv.

JUDGMENT

NAGARATHNA, J.

Leave granted.

2. The appellants herein were the writ petitioners in W.P. No.3872/2022 filed before Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, assailing the cancellation of the auction of Plot No.P-4/2 admeasuring 4800 square meters situated at Chikhalthana Industrial Area at Aurangabad which auction was conducted by the respondent - Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Limited (“MIDC”, for the sake of convenience). The said writ petition was heard along with W.P. No.1324/2023 filed by the respondent-Pratik Group. By the impugned order dated 09.08.2023, the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court observed as under:

    “14. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that Writ Petition No.3872 of 2022 lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed and is dismissed accordingly. We further direct Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to start fresh bidding process in relation to the property being plot No.P-4/2 admeasuring 4800 square meters situated in Chikhalthana Industrial Area at Aurangabad.

    15. As far as Writ Petition No.1324 of 2023 is concerned, we are of the view that in view of dismissal of the aforesaid Writ Petition, present Writ Petition can

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top