ORDER :

1. The present application is preferred by the applicant – original accused under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 for suspension of sentence awarded to him vide judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 20.3.2013 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.7, Ahmedabad City in Sessions Case No.84 of 2010.

(b) That learned trial Court has failed to appreciate glaring and serious infirmities in the prosecution case and despite there being contradiction in the evidences adduced by the prosecution which are fatal in nature have been brushed aside and has wrongly convicted the present applicant.

4. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties and also gone through the charges levelled against the present accused.

6. We have carefully considered the submissions made by learned advocates for both the sides. We have also perused the impugned judgement and order. In a serious offence of attracting the rigorous punishment, the Appellate Court has to assess the record only to see as to whether there is any apparent or gross error on which this Court can arrive at a